Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235990›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Morphological, Mechanical and Gas Penetration Properties of Elastomer Composites with Hybrid Fillers.

Tuba Evgin, Matej Mičušík, Peter Machata, Hamed Peidayesh, Jozef Preťo, Mária Omastová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tuba EvginPolymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 41 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-8245-3075
Matej MičušíkPolymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 41 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2751-5381
Peter MachataPolymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 41 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Hamed PeidayeshPolymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 41 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-4102-7731
Jozef PreťoVipo, a.s., Generála Svobodu 1069/4, 958 01 Partizánske, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-0392
Mária OmastováPolymer Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 845 41 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-5861

Funding

Scientific Grant Agency of minister of education science, research and sports of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak academy of sciences VEGA 02/0006/22Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-20-0593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethylene-propylene-diene monomer (EPDM)-based composites including four different types of graphene nanoplatelets (GnPs) were prepared to evaluate the size effects of GnPs in terms of both specific surface area and lateral size on the morphological, mechanical, and viscoelastic properties, swelling ratio, crosslink density, and oxygen permeability. EPDM-based hybrid composites with GnPs and carbon black (CB) fillers were prepared, with the concentrations of 20 and 50 phr of CB and GnPs up to 7 phr. All samples were prepared using the melt mixing method, followed by compression molding. The specific surface area of GnPs is a more important key factor for mechanical and viscoelastic properties than its lateral size. The presence of GnPs leads to a decrease in the swelling ratio and oxygen permeability of the matrix while an increase in the crosslinking density. For a given specific surface area of GnPs (170 m

Indexed as

carbon black (CB)dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM)gas penetrationgraphene nanoplatelets (GnPs)mechanical propertiespolymer composites

Identifiers

PMID36235990
PMCPMC9572072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.