Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235989›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Fabrication and Testing of Multi-Hierarchical Porous Scaffolds Designed for Bone Regeneration via Additive Manufacturing Processes.

Carmen M González-Henríquez, Fernando E Rodríguez-Umanzor, Nicolas F Acuña-Ruiz, Gloria E Vera-Rojas, Claudio Terraza-Inostroza, Nicolas A Cohn-Inostroza, Andrés Utrera, Mauricio A Sarabia-Vallejos, Juan Rodríguez-Hernández

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmen M González-HenríquezDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Matemáticas y del Medio Ambiente, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago 7800003, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-5425
Fernando E Rodríguez-UmanzorDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Matemáticas y del Medio Ambiente, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago 7800003, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7036-4665
Nicolas F Acuña-RuizDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Matemáticas y del Medio Ambiente, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago 7800003, Chile.
Gloria E Vera-RojasDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Matemáticas y del Medio Ambiente, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago 7800003, Chile.
Claudio Terraza-InostrozaResearch Laboratory for Organic Polymer (RLOP), Facultad de Química y Farmacia, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7810000, Chile.
Nicolas A Cohn-InostrozaLaboratorio de Nanobiomateriales, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Odontológicas, Facultad de odontología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8380544, Chile.
Andrés UtreraDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 9170124, Chile.
Mauricio A Sarabia-VallejosFacultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago 8420524, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5128-796X
Juan Rodríguez-HernándezPolymer Functionalization Group, Departamento de Química Macromolecular Aplicada, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Polímeros-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ICTP-CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Metropolitan University of Technology · CLConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLSan Sebastián University · CLUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CLUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

FONDECYT 1200329FONDECYT 1220251FONDEQUIP EQM 130028Metropolitan University of Technology L318-02Metropolitan University of Technology LPR20-03Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MAT2016-78437-RMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades RTI2018-096328-B-I00Ministry of Education UTM 1999San Sebastián University VRID FAI 21/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone implants or replacements are very scarce due to the low donor availability and the high rate of body rejection. For this reason, tissue engineering strategies have been developed as alternative solutions to this problem. This research sought to create a cellular scaffold with an intricate and complex network of interconnected pores and microchannels using salt leaching and additive manufacturing (3D printing) methods that mimic the hierarchical internal structure of the bone. A biocompatible hydrogel film (based on poly-ethylene glycol) was used to cover the surface of different polymeric scaffolds. This thin film was then exposed to various stimuli to spontaneously form wrinkled micropatterns, with the aim of increasing the contact area and the material's biocompatibility. The main innovation of this study was to include these wrinkled micropatterns on the surface of the scaffold by taking advantage of thin polymer film surface instabilities. On the other hand, salt and nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) particles were included in the polymeric matrix to create a modified filament for 3D printing. The printed part was leached to eliminate porogen particles, leaving homogenously distributed pores on the structure. The pores have a mean size of 26.4 ± 9.9 μm, resulting in a global scaffold porosity of ~42% (including pores and microchannels). The presence of nHA particles, which display a homogeneous distribution according to the FE-SEM and EDX results, have a slight influence on the mechanical resistance of the material, but incredibly, despite being a bioactive compound for bone cells, did not show a significant increase in cell viability on the scaffold surface. However, the synergistic effect between the presence of the hydrogel and the pores on the material does produce an increase in cell viability compared to the control sample and the bare PCL material.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingATRP synthesisbone scaffoldsalt leachingwrinkled micropatterns

Identifiers

PMID36235989
PMCPMC9571634
OpenAlexW4297548890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.