ArticlePolymers2022
Experimental and Theoretical Study on Flexural Behavior of GFRP- and CFRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams after High-Temperature Exposure.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Behavior and Fatigue of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams Exposed to Different Weathering Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Residual Flexural Behavior of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer After High Temperature Exposure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, in order to study the flexural behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars with reinforced concrete beams under static loads after high-temperature exposure, seven pieces of FRP-reinforced concrete beams were subjected to static bending tests and calculation model derivations. Four-point bending tests were carried out on FRP-reinforced concrete beams after high temperature treatment. The effects of high temperature and types of FRP bars on the cracking load, crack development, deflection and ultimate capacity, and failure mode of concrete beams were investigated. The test results show that the maximum crack width, deflection, and ultimate bearing capacity of GFRP- and CFRP-reinforced concrete beams decrease obviously with a rise in high temperature. After the exposure of 400 °C for 2 h, compared with the behavior of concrete beams at room temperature, the maximum crack width of GFRP and CFRP-reinforced concrete beams increased by 42.9% and 41.7%, respectively, the deflection increases by 103.6% and 22.0%, and the ultimate bearing capacity decrease by 11.9% and 3.9%. Meanwhile, through the analysis of the existing research results and test results, the calculation models for the maximum crack width, deflection, and residual ultimate capacity of FRP-reinforced concrete beams after exposure of high temperature were proposed. For FRP-reinforced concrete beams after high-temperature exposure, the errors between the measured maximum crack width, stiffness, residual bearing capacity, and their corresponding calculated values using the model were mostly less than 10%. The calculated value using the proposed model in this research is in good agreement with the measured value. The mechanical properties of FRP-reinforced high-strength concrete structures after high-temperature exposure can be preliminarily predicted, which provides a new theoretical basis for the application of FRP-reinforced concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.