Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235935›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Extraction and Physico-Chemical Characterization of Chitosan from Mantis Shrimp (

Suthasinee Yarnpakdee, Pimonpan Kaewprachu, Chalalai Jaisan, Theeraphol Senphan, Muralidharan Nagarajan, Sutee Wangtueai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Slow freezing and 3DAnimal reproduction · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Suthasinee YarnpakdeeDivision of Marine Product Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2008-3419
Pimonpan KaewprachuCluster of Innovative Food and Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-0013
Chalalai JaisanCluster of Innovative Food and Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-9706
Theeraphol SenphanFaculty of Engineering and Agro-Industry, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50290, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9632-4354
Muralidharan NagarajanTamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Department of Fish Processing Technology, Dr. MGR Fisheries College and Research Institute, Ponneri 601 204, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5305-1985
Sutee WangtueaiCollege of Maritime Studies and Management, Chiang Mai University, Samut Sakhon 74000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5811-1721
Chiang Mai University · THMaejo University · THTamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalalitha Fisheries University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mantis shrimp (Oratosquilla nepa) exoskeleton, a leftover generated after processing, was used as a starting material for chitosan (CS) production. CS was extracted with different deacetylation times (2, 3 and 4 h), termed CS−2, CS−3 and CS−4, respectively, and their characteristics and antimicrobial and film properties with agarose (AG) were investigated. Prolonged deacetylation time increased the degree of deacetylation (DDA: 73.56 ± 0.09−75.56 ± 0.09%), while extraction yield (15.79 ± 0.19−14.13 ± 0.09%), intrinsic viscosity (η: 3.58 ± 0.09−2.97 ± 0.16 dL/g) and average molecular weight (Mν: 1.4 ± 0.05−1.12 ± 0.08 (×106 Da)) decreased (p < 0.05). FTIR spectra of extracted CS were similar to that of commercial CS. Among all the CS samples prepared, CS−3 had the best yield, DDA, Mν and antimicrobial activity. Therefore, it was chosen for the development of composite films with AG at different ratios (CS−3/AG; 100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 and 0/100). As the proportion of AG increased, the tensile strength (29.96 ± 1.80−89.70 ± 5.08 MPa) of the composite films increased, while thickness (0.056 ± 0.012−0.024 ± 0.001 mm), elongation at break (36.52 ± 1.12−25.32 ± 1.23%) and water vapor permeability (3.56 ± 0.10−1.55 ± 0.02 (×10−7 g m m−2 s−1 Pa−1)) decreased (p < 0.05). Moreover, lightness of the films increased and yellowness decreased. CS−3/AG (50/50) composite film exhibited high mechanical and barrier properties and excellent compatibility according to FTIR and SEM analyses. According to these finding, mantis shrimp exoskeleton could be used to produce CS. The developed bio-composite film based on an appropriate ratio (50/50) of CS−3 and AG has potential for being used as food packaging material.

Indexed as

agarosebarrier propertieschitosancomposite filmdeacetylationmantis shrimp

Identifiers

PMID36235935
PMCPMC9570686
OpenAlexW4297223529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.