ArticleNutrients2022
Eating Choices-The Roles of Motivation and Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dietary Quality and Intake of Cancer Caregivers: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies and Recommendations for Future Research.Cancer medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Experience, barriers and facilitators of discharge readiness in patients with acute pancreatitis: a descriptive qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Measuring eHealth Literacy in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Consumption Patterns and Product Format Preferences of Inner Beauty Functional Foods Among Korean Adults.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Relationship between Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy and Dietary Behaviors in Adults: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2026Article
- Nutrition knowledge, label use, and dietary diversity among a sample of university students in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional investigation.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
- Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Healthy Eating in UK Truck Drivers.Safety and health at work · 2025Article
- Ineffective health maintenance behaviors in people with chronic conditions: Systematic review of etiology and risk.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Food choice motivations and perceptions of healthy eating: a cross-sectional study among consumers in the UAE.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Modeling predictors of behavior of American consumers suffering from food intolerances or food allergies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- How perceived risk of recurrence strengthens health management awareness in stroke patients: the chain mediating role of risk fear and health literacy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Impact of a Nutrition Knowledge Intervention on Knowledge and Food Behaviour of Women Within a Rural Community.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Article
- Health Literacy and Its Association with the Adoption of the Mediterranean Diet: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Adaptation and Validation of the S-NutLit Scale to Assess Nutritional Literacy in the Peruvian Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Predicting willingness to consume healthy brand foods using the theory of planned behavior: the role of nutritional literacy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Perceptions, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Cannabis and its Use: A Qualitative Study among Herbal Heart Study Young Adult Cannabis Consumers in South Florida.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Motivations Associated with Food Choices among Adults from Urban Setting.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food choices are determined by intrinsic and extrinsic product characteristics, biological and physiological features, psychological factors, and situational and socio-cultural factors. Self-determination theory offers the explanation of health behavior change identifying motivations located along a continuum of autonomy. Another approach to the motivations guiding health behaviors, including food choices, relies on distinguishing thematic categories. Health motivations seem to be an obvious determinant of health behaviors, but final decisions regarding health are also the effect of other types of motivations such as economic, cultural, or emotional. The role of marketing pressure in modern society is perceived to be an important source of motivation for purchasing food and other products. The Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) framework was initially proposed in order to explain the processing of brand information from advertisements and was later expanded to other areas, including health and nutritional behaviors. The aim of this study was the analysis of determinants of food choices. We have developed a common regression model including six categories of motivations addressed by the Eating Motivations Scale and three health literacy types corresponding with element of ability from the MOA framework, adjusted for socio-demographic factors, health status, and the use of the Internet and TV. The analysis was performed on data from a computer-assisted web-based interviewing (CAWI) survey among 2008 adult Internet users completed in May 2022. The uni- and multivariate linear regression models were developed with the Index of Unhealthy Food Choices (IUFC), calculated based on the responses to items asking about the frequency of the consumption of twelve food categories. Univariate modeling revealed that IUFC is significantly associated with health, food, and e-health literacies and with five out of six eating motivations. However, the multivariate regression model yielded significant associations only for eating motivations but not for the three literacy scores. Health motivation was negatively associated with IUFC (B, standard error (SE): 0.83, 0.07; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.98-0.69), but positively with emotional (B, SE: 0.22, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.14-0.3), economic (B, SE: 0.41, 0.08; 95% CI: 0.25-0.56), and marketing (B, SE: 0.62, 0.08; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) motivations. Our findings suggest that motivations guiding food choices may prevail over the element of 'ability' distinguished in the frameworks and models that explain people's behaviors, including behaviors relating to health. Thus, it is essential to emphasize development of appropriate motivations and not only to provide knowledge and skills. Furthermore, one should also remember motivations other than health motivations when searching for the determinants of health behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.