Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235612›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Altered Gut Microbiota and Its Clinical Relevance in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: Shanghai Aging Study and Shanghai Memory Study.

Zheng Zhu, Xiaoxi Ma, Jie Wu, Zhenxu Xiao, Wanqing Wu, Saineng Ding, Li Zheng, Xiaoniu Liang, Jianfeng Luo, Ding Ding and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zheng ZhuInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Xiaoxi MaInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-3700
Jie WuInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Zhenxu XiaoInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Wanqing WuInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Saineng DingInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Li ZhengInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Xiaoniu LiangInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Jianfeng LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Ding DingInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Qianhua ZhaoInstitute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-158X
Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773513National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071200National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173599Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC2020CR4007Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2018SHZDZX01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered gut microbiota has been reported in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Previous research has suggested that specific bacterial species might be associated with the decline of cognitive function. However, the evidence was insufficient, and the results were inconsistent. To determine whether there is an alteration of gut microbiota in patients with MCI and AD and to investigate its correlation with clinical characteristics, the fecal samples from 94 cognitively normal controls (NC), 125 participants with MCI, and 83 patients with AD were collected and analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. The overall microbial compositions and specific taxa were compared. The clinical relevance was analyzed. There was no significant overall difference in the alpha and beta diversity among the three groups. Patients with AD or MCI had increased bacterial taxa including Erysipelatoclostridiaceae, Erysipelotrichales, Patescibacteria, Saccharimonadales, and Saccharimonadia, compared with NC group (p < 0.05), which were positively correlated with APOE 4 carrier status and Clinical Dementia Rating (correlation coefficient: 0.11~0.31, p < 0.05), and negatively associated with memory (correlation coefficient: −0.19~−0.16, p < 0.01). Our results supported the hypothesis that intestinal microorganisms change in MCI and AD. The alteration in specific taxa correlated closely with clinical manifestations, indicating the potential role in AD pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgingApolipoprotein E4ChinaHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SApolipoprotein E4RNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S ribosomal RNAAlzheimer’s diseasegut microbiomemild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID36235612
PMCPMC9570603
OpenAlexW4297238125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.