Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235541›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Amino Acid Profiles and Nutritional Evaluation of Fresh Sweet-Waxy Corn from Three Different Regions of China.

Ziqi Li, Tiannuo Hong, Guohui Shen, Yanting Gu, Yanzhi Guo, Juan Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ziqi LiInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Tiannuo HongInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Guohui ShenInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Yanting GuInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Yanzhi GuoInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.
Juan HanInstitute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4820-5553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study conducted a comparative analysis of the amino acid compositions of Chinese Huangnuo 9 fresh sweet-waxy corn from three different provinces in China-Inner Mongolia, Jilin, and Heilongjiang Province. Moreover, we established a nutritive evaluation system based on amino acid profiles to evaluate, compare, and rank the fresh sweet-waxy corn planted in different regions. A total of 17 amino acids were quantified, and the amino acid composition of fresh sweet-waxy corn was analyzed and evaluated. The amino acid quality was determined by the amino acid pattern spectrum, chemical evaluations (including CS, AAS, EAAI, BV, U(a,u), NI, F, predict PER, and PDCAAS), flavor evaluation, amino acid matching degree evaluation, and the results of the factor analysis. The results showed that the protein content of fresh corn 1-1 from Inner Mongolia was the highest (40.26 ± 0.35 mg/g), but the factor analysis results, digestion, and absorption efficiency of fresh corn 1-2 were the best. The amino acid profile of fresh corn 1-1 was closest to each evaluation's model spectrum. The results of the diversity evaluations in fresh corn 3-2 were the best, and fresh corn 3-3 had the most essential amino acid content. A total of 17 amino acids in fresh corn were divided into three principal component factor analyses: functional principal components (Leu, Pro, Glu, His, Ile, Ser, Met, Val, Tyr, Thr), regulatory principal components (Lys, Gly, Ala, Asp, Arg, Trp), and protection principal components (Phe). The scores of the three principal components and the comprehensive score in fresh corn 1-2 were all the highest, followed by 3-3 and 1-1. The amino acid nutritional values of fresh corn 1-2 were the highest in 12 samples.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsZea maysAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acids, EssentialPeptide FragmentsTrypsinWaxesAmino AcidsAmino Acids, EssentialPeptide FragmentsTrypsinWaxesamino acid profilesamino acids evaluationfactor analysisfresh cornnutritional evaluationPCA

Identifiers

PMID36235541
PMCPMC9572857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.