Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235144›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep Eutectic Solvents: Alternative Solvents for Biomass-Based Waste Valorization.

Giovanni P Rachiero, Paula Berton, Julia Shamshina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extraction and Identification of Active Components fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A New Method of ExtractingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giovanni P RachieroValagro S.p.A., Via Cagliari 1, 66041 Atessa, Chieti, Italy.
Paula BertonChemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4488-6686
Julia ShamshinaFiber and Biopolymer Research Institute (FBRI), Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0708-764X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative technologies can transform what are now considered "waste streams" into feedstocks for a range of products. Indeed, the use of biomass as a source of biopolymers and chemicals currently has a consolidated economic dimension, with well-developed and regulated markets, in which the evaluation of the manufacturing processes relies on specific criteria such as purity and yield, and respects defined regulatory parameters for the process safety. In this context, ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents have been proposed as environmentally friendly solvents for applications related to biomass waste valorization. This mini-review draws attention to some recent advancements in the use of a series of new-solvent technologies, with an emphasis on deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as key players in the development of new processes for biomass waste valorization. This work aims to highlight the role and importance of DESs in the following three strategic areas: chitin recovery from biomass and isolation of valuable chemicals and biofuels from biomass waste streams.

Indexed as

Ionic LiquidsBiofuelsBiomassChitinDeep Eutectic SolventsSolventsBiofuelsChitinDeep Eutectic SolventsIonic LiquidsSolventsbiomass recoverycircular economydeep eutectic solventsionic liquids

Identifiers

PMID36235144
PMCPMC9573730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.