Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235141›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Synthesis and Inhibitory Activity of Machaeridiol-Based Novel Anti-MRSA and Anti-VRE Compounds and Their Profiling for Cancer-Related Signaling Pathways.

Mallika Kumarihamy, Siddharth Tripathi, Premalatha Balachandran, Bharathi Avula, Jianping Zhao, Mei Wang, Maria M Bennett, Jin Zhang, Mary A Carr, K Michael Lovell and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mallika KumarihamyNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.
Siddharth TripathiNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.
Premalatha BalachandranNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-9591
Bharathi AvulaNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.
Jianping ZhaoNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-5931
Mei WangNatural Products Utilization Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, USA Department of Agriculture, University City, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3686-4292
Maria M BennettNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.
Jin ZhangNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9309-8657
Mary A CarrDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
K Michael LovellDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Ocean I WellingtonDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Mary E MarquartDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3557-6048
N P Dhammika NanayakkaraNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-8464
Ilias MuhammadNational Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University City, MS 38677, USA.
University of Mississippi · USState Street (United States) · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture 58-6060- 6-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three unique 5,6-seco-hexahydrodibenzopyrans (seco-HHDBP) machaeridiols A−C, reported previously from Machaerium Pers., have displayed potent activities against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and E. faecalis (VRE). In order to enrich the pipeline of natural product-derived antimicrobial compounds, a series of novel machaeridiol-based analogs (1−17) were prepared by coupling stemofuran, pinosylvin, and resveratrol legends with monoterpene units R-(−)-α-phellandrene, (−)-p-mentha-2,8-diene-1-ol, and geraniol, and their inhibitory activities were profiled against MRSA ATCC 1708, VRE ATCC 700221, and cancer signaling pathways. Compounds 5 and 11 showed strong in vitro activities with MIC values of 2.5 μg/mL and 1.25 μg/mL against MRSA, respectively, and 2.50 μg/mL against VRE, while geranyl analog 14 was found to be moderately active (MIC 5 μg/mL). The reduction of the double bonds of the monoterpene unit of compound 5 resulted in 17, which had the same antibacterial potency (MIC 1.25 μg/mL and 2.50 μg/mL) as its parent, 5. Furthermore, a combination study between seco-HHDBP 17 and HHDBP machaeriol C displayed a synergistic effect with a fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) value of 0.5 against MRSA, showing a four-fold decrease in the MIC values of both 17 and machaeriol C, while no such effect was observed between vancomycin and 17. Compounds 11 and 17 were further tested in vivo against nosocomial MRSA at a single intranasal dose of 30 mg/kg in a murine model, and both compounds were not efficacious under these conditions. Finally, compounds 1−17 were profiled against a panel of luciferase genes that assessed the activity of complex cancer-related signaling pathways (i.e., transcription factors) using T98G glioblastoma multiforme cells. Among the compounds tested, the geranyl-substituted analog 14 exhibited strong inhibition against several signaling pathways, notably Smad, Myc, and Notch, with IC50 values of 2.17 μM, 1.86 μM, and 2.15 μM, respectively. In contrast, the anti-MRSA actives 5 and 17 were found to be inactive (IC50 > 20 μM) across the panel of these cancer-signaling pathways.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBiological ProductsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNeoplasmsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsLuciferasesMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonoterpenesResveratrolSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBiological ProductsLuciferasesMonoterpenesResveratrolTranscription FactorsVancomycinantibacterialanticancerin vivo nosocomial MRSA assaymachaeridiol analogsMRSAsynthesistranscription factorsVRE

Identifiers

PMID36235141
PMCPMC9570708
OpenAlexW4303958951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.