Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36234792›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Objective Supervised Machine Learning-Based Classification and Inference of Biological Neuronal Networks.

Michael Taynnan Barros, Harun Siljak, Peter Mullen, Constantinos Papadias, Jari Hyttinen, Nicola Marchetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael Taynnan BarrosComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group/BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33100 Tampere, Finland.
Harun SiljakSchool of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-2683
Peter MullenSchool of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.
Constantinos PapadiasAmerican College of Greece, 153 42 Agia Paraskevi, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0894-5856
Jari HyttinenComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group/BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33100 Tampere, Finland.
Nicola MarchettiSchool of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3788-5845
Trinity College Dublin · IETampere University · FIThe American College of Greece · GRUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of biological neuron types and networks poses challenges to the full understanding of the human brain's organisation and functioning. In this paper, we develop a novel objective classification model of biological neuronal morphology and electrical types and their networks, based on the attributes of neuronal communication using supervised machine learning solutions. This presents advantages compared to the existing approaches in neuroinformatics since the data related to mutual information or delay between neurons obtained from spike trains are more abundant than conventional morphological data. We constructed two open-access computational platforms of various neuronal circuits from the Blue Brain Project realistic models, named Neurpy and Neurgen. Then, we investigated how we could perform network tomography with cortical neuronal circuits for the morphological, topological and electrical classification of neurons. We extracted the simulated data of 10,000 network topology combinations with five layers, 25 morphological type (m-type) cells, and 14 electrical type (e-type) cells. We applied the data to several different classifiers (including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Networks). We achieved accuracies of up to 70%, and the inference of biological network structures using network tomography reached up to 65% of accuracy. Objective classification of biological networks can be achieved with cascaded machine learning methods using neuron communication data. SVM methods seem to perform better amongst used techniques. Our research not only contributes to existing classification efforts but sets the road-map for future usage of brain-machine interfaces towards an in vivo objective classification of neurons as a sensing mechanism of the brain's structure.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSupervised Machine LearningHumansMachine LearningNeuronsSupport Vector Machinecell-classificationcortical circuitsinformation theorynetwork tomographyneuroinformaticssupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID36234792
PMCPMC9573053
OpenAlexW4296828751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.