Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36234502›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Deep Learning Models for Predicting Gas Adsorption Capacity of Nanomaterials.

Wenjing Guo, Jie Liu, Fan Dong, Ru Chen, Jayanti Das, Weigong Ge, Xiaoming Xu, Huixiao Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Machine learning and deep learning for brain tumor MRI image segmentation.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenjing GuoNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
Jie LiuNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
Fan DongNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
Ru ChenCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Jayanti DasCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Weigong GeNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
Xiaoming XuCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-0830
Huixiao HongNational Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8087-3968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), a class of porous nanomaterials, have been widely used in gas adsorption-based applications due to their high porosities and chemical tunability. To facilitate the discovery of high-performance MOFs for different applications, a variety of machine learning models have been developed to predict the gas adsorption capacities of MOFs. Most of the predictive models are developed using traditional machine learning algorithms. However, the continuously increasing sizes of MOF datasets and the complicated relationships between MOFs and their gas adsorption capacities make deep learning a suitable candidate to handle such big data with increased computational power and accuracy. In this study, we developed models for predicting gas adsorption capacities of MOFs using two deep learning algorithms, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, with a hypothetical set of about 130,000 structures of MOFs with methane and carbon dioxide adsorption data at different pressures. The models were evaluated using 10 iterations of 10-fold cross validations and 100 holdout validations. The MLP and LSTM models performed similarly with high prediction accuracy. The models for predicting gas adsorption at a higher pressure outperformed the models for predicting gas adsorption at a lower pressure. The deep learning models are more accurate than the random forest models reported in the literature, especially for predicting gas adsorption capacities at low pressures. Our results demonstrated that deep learning algorithms have a great potential to generate models that can accurately predict the gas adsorption capacities of MOFs.

Indexed as

deep learninggas adsorptionmetal–organic framework

Identifiers

PMID36234502
PMCPMC9565823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.