ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Deep Learning Models for Predicting Gas Adsorption Capacity of Nanomaterials.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Visualization Analysis of Machine Learning Applications in Gas Adsorption Using Nanoporous Materials.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Leveraging machine learning for selective cannabinoid ligand discovery: methods, challenges, and opportunities.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2026Review
- Nanoconfined Methane Storage Mechanism in Deep Coal Seams: A Wettability-Coupled Simplified Local Density Model.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of Soft Computing Represented by Regression Machine Learning Model and Artificial Lemming Algorithm in Predictions for Hydrogen Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A data driven machine learning approach for predicting and optimizing sulfur compound adsorption on metal organic frameworks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025Review
- A refined set of RxNorm drug names for enhancing unstructured data analysis in drug safety surveillance.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Fingerprinting Interactions between Proteins and Ligands for Facilitating Machine Learning in Drug Discovery.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Machine learning and deep learning for brain tumor MRI image segmentation.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Application of Machine Learning in Material Synthesis and Property Prediction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), a class of porous nanomaterials, have been widely used in gas adsorption-based applications due to their high porosities and chemical tunability. To facilitate the discovery of high-performance MOFs for different applications, a variety of machine learning models have been developed to predict the gas adsorption capacities of MOFs. Most of the predictive models are developed using traditional machine learning algorithms. However, the continuously increasing sizes of MOF datasets and the complicated relationships between MOFs and their gas adsorption capacities make deep learning a suitable candidate to handle such big data with increased computational power and accuracy. In this study, we developed models for predicting gas adsorption capacities of MOFs using two deep learning algorithms, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, with a hypothetical set of about 130,000 structures of MOFs with methane and carbon dioxide adsorption data at different pressures. The models were evaluated using 10 iterations of 10-fold cross validations and 100 holdout validations. The MLP and LSTM models performed similarly with high prediction accuracy. The models for predicting gas adsorption at a higher pressure outperformed the models for predicting gas adsorption at a lower pressure. The deep learning models are more accurate than the random forest models reported in the literature, especially for predicting gas adsorption capacities at low pressures. Our results demonstrated that deep learning algorithms have a great potential to generate models that can accurately predict the gas adsorption capacities of MOFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.