ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Simulation Analysis of Delamination Damage for the Thick-Walled Composite-Overwrapped Pressure Vessels.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to verify the delamination damage occurring in thick-walled composite-overwrapped pressure vessels, firstly, for composite delamination damage, a composite laminate model was established. Model I and model II delamination failure processes of composite structures were simulated and verified based on a tiebreak contact algorithm for different mesh sizes, respectively, and the approximate equivalent results were achieved by correcting the inter-ply strength. Then, for in-plane damage to composite materials, the elastic-plastic process was verified by selecting a progressive damage model, with quasistatic nonlinear tensile shear of sample specimens as an example. Further, under the purpose of generality and simplicity, the location of the first occurrence of delamination failure was simulated and analyzed with the tiebreak contact algorithm and a reasonable mesh size, using quasistatic loading of a thick composite-overwrapped pressure vessel cylindrical section as an example. The results showed that delamination occurred at approximately the center, which is in general agreement with the experimentally observed phenomenon. On this basis, the locations of the first significant delamination phenomena in composite-overwrapped vessels under three different ratios of plus or minus 45-degree layup angles were predicted. Finally, the differences in structural strength between the single laying methods and the combined laying method were compared. The results showed that the ratio of 50% had a higher modulus value than a pure 0° ply, but too large a ratio was detrimental to the improvement of structural properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.