Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36234139›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Interest for Dental Restorations: A Systematic Review.

Vanessa Moby, Lucien Dupagne, Vincent Fouquet, Jean-Pierre Attal, Philippe François, Elisabeth Dursun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 3D Printing for Dental Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa MobyIngénierie Moléculaire et Physiopathologie Articulaire (IMoPA), UMR 7365 CNRS-Université de Lorraine, F-54505 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3082-4153
Lucien DupagneInnovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i, UR4462), Faculty of Health, Université de Paris, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, 92120 Montrouge, France.
Vincent FouquetInnovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i, UR4462), Faculty of Health, Université de Paris, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, 92120 Montrouge, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-7795
Jean-Pierre AttalInnovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i, UR4462), Faculty of Health, Université de Paris, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, 92120 Montrouge, France.
Philippe FrançoisInnovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i, UR4462), Faculty of Health, Université de Paris, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, 92120 Montrouge, France.
Elisabeth DursunInnovative Dental Materials and Interfaces Research Unit (URB2i, UR4462), Faculty of Health, Université de Paris, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux, 92120 Montrouge, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the optimal printing parameters for the producing of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-printed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) elements with mechanical properties suitable for dental restorations. Indeed, the mechanical properties are a critical prerequisite for the study of other parameters, such as physical, aesthetic and biological properties. An exhaustive electronic search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase and Web of knowledge databases to gather all the studies evaluating the influence of the printing parameters on the obtained mechanical properties of FDM 3D-printed PEEK elements were selected. Initially, the search resulted in 614 eligible papers. Independent screenings of the abstracts were performed by two authors to identify the articles related to the question. Twenty-nine studies were selected, of which eleven were further excluded after reading of the full text, and finally, eighteen articles were included in this review. The studies were difficult to compare due to the variability of the printing parameters and the types of PEEK. However, it seems interesting to use a high infill rate, a high chamber temperature close to that of the printing temperature and a heat post-treatment to obtain 3D PEEK elements presenting properties adapted to use as dental restorations. The analysis of the available literature suggested that the properties of PEEK could make it an interesting material in dental restorations to be performed with FDM additive manufacturing.

Indexed as

3D printingdental materialdental restorationsfused deposition modelingfused filament fabricationpolyetheretherketone (PEEK)printing parameters

Identifiers

PMID36234139
PMCPMC9572506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.