Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36234087›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Optimization of Tensile Strength and Young's Modulus of CNT-CF/Epoxy Composites Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM).

Md Rezaur Rahman, Nur-Azzah Afifah Binti Taib, Mohammed Mahbubul Matin, Mohammed Muzibur Rahman, Muhammad Khusairy Bin Bakri, Taranenko Pavel Alexanrovich, Sinitsin Vladimir Vladimirovich, Khairuddin Sanaullah, Diana Tazeddinova, Afrasyab Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Md Rezaur RahmanFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Nur-Azzah Afifah Binti TaibFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Mohammed Mahbubul MatinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-4965-2280
Mohammed Muzibur RahmanDepartment of Chemistry, Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials Research (CEAMR), Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-1244
Muhammad Khusairy Bin BakriFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1971-2350
Taranenko Pavel AlexanrovichResearch Institute of Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Sinitsin Vladimir VladimirovichResearch Laboratory of Technical Self-Diagnostics and Self-Control of Devices and Systems, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Khairuddin SanaullahFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohammad Musa, Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Diana TazeddinovaDepartment of Food Technology and Organization of Public Catering, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.
Afrasyab KhanResearch Institute of Mechanical Engineering, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.
South Ural State University · RUUniversiti Malaysia Sarawak · MYKing Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of Chittagong · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composites such as carbon fiber are used extensively by automotive, aerospace, marine, and energy industries due to their strong mechanical properties. However, there are still many areas it is lacking in testing, especially related to its electrophoretic deposition. In this research work, the tensile strength and Young's modulus of CNT-CF/epoxy composites were measured using the tensile test by varying the electrophoretic deposition (EPD) process parameters. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the three main parameters in this EPD process: the volume ratio (water as the basis), deposition voltage, and time to obtain the maximum tensile properties of the composites. There were four volume ratios (0%, 20%, 80% and 100%) used in this design of experiment (DoE) with ratios' pairs of 0%, 100%, and 20%, 80%. For this study, water and methanol were used as the suspension medium. This design's deposition voltage and time were 10 to 20 V and 5 to 15 min. ANOVA further verified the responses' adequacy. The optimum conditions for the first Design of Experiment (DoE) (0% and 100%) were identified as a volume ratio of 99.99% water, deposition voltage of 10 V, and 12.14 min. These conditions provided the maximum strength of these composites with a tensile strength of 7.41 N/mm

Indexed as

ANOVACNT–CF/epoxy compositedeposition timedeposition voltageelectrophoretic deposition (EPD)response surface methodologytensile strengthvolume ratioYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID36234087
PMCPMC9571775
OpenAlexW4297477531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.