Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233697›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Taslim Aboudou, Meixuan Li, Zeliang Zhang, Zhengfeng Wang, Yanfei Li, Lufang Feng, Xiajing Chu, Nan Chen, Wence Zhou, Kehu Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Efficacy of microwave ablationWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taslim AboudouThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7958-1706
Meixuan LiEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Zeliang ZhangThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Zhengfeng WangThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Yanfei LiEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Lufang FengEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Xiajing ChuEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-8074
Nan ChenEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Wence ZhouThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-7777
Kehu YangThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.

Funding

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities lzujbky-2021-ct06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of robotic compared to laparoscopic hepatectomy, with a special focus on the meta-analysis method. Original studies were collected from three Chinese databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Our systematic review was conducted on 682 patients with robotic liver resection, and 1101 patients were operated by laparoscopic platform. Robotic surgery has a long surgical duration (MD = 43.99, 95% CI: 23.45-64.53,

Indexed as

hepaticlaparoscopicmeta-analysisoutcomesrobotic

Identifiers

PMID36233697
PMCPMC9571364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.