Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233681›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Outcomes and Reliability of Perforator Flaps in the Reconstruction of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Defects: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Camille Vaillant, Yanis Berkane, Elise Lupon, Michael Atlan, Pascal Rousseau, Alexandre G Lellouch, Jérôme Duisit, Nicolas Bertheuil

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurative.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Camille VaillantDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France.
Yanis BerkaneDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-5132
Elise LuponDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Rangueil Hospital, CHU Toulouse, 31013 Toulouse, France.
Michael AtlanDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, 75020 Paris, France.
Pascal RousseauDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU Angers, 49933 Angers, France.
Alexandre G LellouchVascularized Composite Allotransplantation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Shriners Children's Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8191-8662
Jérôme DuisitDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-3879
Nicolas BertheuilDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHU Rennes, University of Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4602-0432
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRShriners Hospitals for Children - Erie · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common and debilitating disease, in which the only effective treatment involves a wide excision of the affected skin. Secondary wound healing and skin grafting are two well-known options for managing these defects, but perforator flaps provide a new therapeutic alternative by ensuring reconstructions of large defects, reducing donor site morbidity, and enhancing functional recovery. The aim of this study was to achieve a systematic review of perforator flaps use in HS. PATIENTS AND

methodsPubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from 1989 to 2021. The PRISMA statement was used in the study selection process and the review was registered on PROSPERO. Furthermore, patient characteristics, operative technique, complications, and recurrences were searched.

resultsThirty-six articles were selected including 286 patients and 387 flaps. Axillary localization was mostly represented (83.2%). Direct donor site closure was achieved in 99.1% of cases. In total, 15.1% of the flaps presented at least one of the following complications: wound dehiscence (5.5%), partial necrosis (2.9%), hematoma or seroma (2.1%), infection (2.1%), venous congestion (1.8%), and nerve injury (0.3%). Two cases of total necrosis were recorded. Recurrence of the disease was observed in 2.7% of the defects.

conclusionsPedicled perforator flaps are a reliable and reproducible technique in the reconstruction of HS defects. They are associated with a low recurrence rate while ensuring an effective reconstruction with reduced morbidity and faster recovery compared to the techniques classically used in this indication.

Indexed as

complicationshidradenitis suppurativaisland flapperforator flappropeller flaprecoveryrecurrenceverneuil disease

Identifiers

PMID36233681
PMCPMC9572569
OpenAlexW4303709893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.