ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Clinical Criteria for Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome: An Exploratory Analysis of Optimal Cut-Off Values for Biomarkers.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal Discordance of the Inflammation, Catabolism and Immunosuppression Triad in Chronic Critical Illness.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Early Prediction and Prognostic Value of Chronic Critical Illness and Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Nomogram for Early Prediction of Inflammation, Catabolism, and Immunosuppression Syndrome in Critically Ill Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The ICS triad in critical illness: a time-dependent pathological driver of mortality and organ dysfunction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular risk in patients with gastrointestinal angiodysplasia: the role of aortic stiffness and non-dipper blood pressure patterns; predictive value of novel inflammatory biomarkers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The Tri-Steps Model of Critical Conditions in Intensive Care: Introducing a New Paradigm for Chronic Critical Illness.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS): a review of definitions, potential therapies, and research priorities.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Review
- LASSO-Based Machine Learning Algorithm for Prediction of PICS Associated with Sepsis.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Intravenous immunoglobulin for mortality and inflammatory status in patients with sepsis: a retrospective database study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Recent nanoengineered therapeutic advancements in sepsis management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Dynamics of iron metabolism in patients with bloodstream infections: a time-course clinical study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Impact of Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome during Intensive Care Admission on Each Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Component in a PICS Clinic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Nanotechnology Applications in Sepsis: Essential Knowledge for Clinicians.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Effects of Antithrombin on Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome among Patients with Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Early Oral/Enteral Feeding and Rehabilitation Are Associated With Lower PIICS Incidence: A Propensity Score-Matched Single Center Study.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While clinical criteria have been proposed for persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS) using C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, and lymphocyte count, there is no substantial basis for their optimal cut-off values. We herein aimed to develop and externally validate clinical criteria for PICS by investigating the optimal cut-off values for these biomarkers using machine-learning approaches and confirmed it with external validation. Methods: To develop criteria, we included ICU patients treated at a tertiary care hospital in Japan between 2018 and 2021 (derivation cohort). We introduced CRP, albumin and lymphocyte counts at around day 14 into six machine-learning models to predict PICS, defined as the compound outcome of the Barthel index (BI) < 70 at hospital discharge and in-hospital death. We incorporated the results of these models to assess the optimal cut-off values for biomarkers. We then developed and externally validated criteria for PICS using a nationwide claims database in Japan (validation cohort). Results: In the derivation cohort, 291 out of 441 patients had BI < 70 or in-hospital death. Based on machine-learning models, the optimal cut-off values for biomarkers to predict them were a CRP of 2.0 mg/dL, albumin of 3.0 g/dL, and a lymphocyte count of 800/μL, with an AUROC of 0.67. In the external validation cohort, 4492 out of 15,302 patients had BI < 70 or in-hospital death. The AUROC of the criteria was 0.71, with sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.68 to predict PICS. Conclusions: We herein provide a fundamental basis for PICS clinical criteria with CRP >2.0 mg/dL, albumin <3.0 g/dL, and a lymphocyte count <800/μL on day 14. The criteria developed will identify patients with PICS whose long-term mortality and activity of daily living may be poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.