Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233628›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Current Insights on Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Leonardo Palazzo, Julius Lindblom, Chandra Mohan, Ioannis Parodis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarkers of Lupus Nephritis Histopathology: Where Do We Stand?Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lupus Nephritis: Unmet Needs and Evolving Solutions.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Lupus nephritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonardo PalazzoDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Julius LindblomDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-9471
Chandra MohanDepartment Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Ioannis ParodisDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-5395
Karolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Monitoring Disease in LupusR01AR074096 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI CHANDRA MOHAN · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Karolinska Institute NAKing Gustaf V's 80-year Foundation FAI-2020-0741Lupus Research Alliance NANIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074096NIH HHS R01 AR074096Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation 2020-00368Stockholm County Council FoUI-955483Swedish Rheumatism Association R-941095Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation 2021-26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, promising emerging biomarkers pave the way toward an improved management of patients with LN. We have reviewed the literature over the past decade, and we herein summarise the most relevant biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis in LN. An initial systematic search of Medline was conducted to identify pertinent articles. A total of 104 studies were selected to be included in this review. Several diagnostic biomarkers, including MCP-1, TWEAK, NGAL, and uric acid, exhibited good ability to differentiate LN patients from non-renal SLE patients. Several cytokines and chemokines, including IL-10, IL-17, MCP-1, and IP-10, hold promise for assessing LN disease activity, as do cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). Angiogenesis-related and haemostasis-related proteins have also displayed potential for monitoring disease activity. Biomarkers of responses to therapy include Axl, CD163, and BAFF, whereas VCAM-1, ALCAM, and ANCAs have been reported as prognostic markers, along with traditional markers. In addition, novel renal tissue biomarkers may prove to be a useful complement to histological evaluations. The overall heterogeneity of the inclusion criteria and outcome measures across different studies, along with a lack of validation in multi-centre cohorts, call for future collaborative efforts. Nevertheless, we foresee that several biomarkers hold promise toward optimisation of the management of LN, with the use of integrated omics and panels of less invasive biomarkers paving the way towards personalised medicine.

Indexed as

biomarkersdiagnosislupus nephritismonitoringprognosissystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID36233628
PMCPMC9570701
OpenAlexW4297477505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.