ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Impact of Treating Age-Related Macular Degeneration before Visual Function Is Impaired.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual outcomes of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have substantially improved via anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. However, the treatment effects vary among individuals. Medical charts of 104 eyes (104 patients) with AMD, treated with anti-VEGF drugs and followed up for 12−36 months, were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for age showed that eyes with an initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) < 0.3 in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) were a positive predictor (odds ratio = 3.172; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.029−9.783; p = 0.045), and the presence of initial fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED) was a negative predictor (0.222; 0.078−0.637; p = 0.005) of maintained or improved BCVA at the final visit. Kaplan−Meier survival analysis showed that eyes with an initial BCVA < 0.3 (Cox hazard ratio = 2.947; 95% CI = 1.047−8.289; p = 0.041) had a better survival rate after adjusting for age when failure was defined as a BCVA reduction ≥ 0.2 of logMAR. Eyes with an initial BCVA < 0.3 belonged to younger patients; more frequently had subretinal fluid as an exudative change; and less frequently had intraretinal fluid, submacular hemorrhage, and fibrovascular PED. Initiating anti-VEGF treatment before BCVA declines and advanced lesions develop would afford better visual outcomes for AMD eyes in the real-world clinic, although further analyses are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.