Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233560›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Safety and Efficacy of an Unflanged 4F Pancreatic Stent in Transpancreatic Precut Sphincterotomy for Patients with Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Jieun Ryu, Kyu-Hyun Paik, Chang-Il Kwon, Dong Hee Koh, Tae Jun Song, Seok Jeong, Won Suk Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jieun RyuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon 34943, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2947-195X
Kyu-Hyun PaikDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon 34943, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-3497
Chang-Il KwonDigestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam 13497, Korea.
Dong Hee KohResearch Group for Endoscopic Instruments and Stents, Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Seoul 03741, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-5805
Tae Jun SongResearch Group for Endoscopic Instruments and Stents, Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Seoul 03741, Korea.
Seok JeongResearch Group for Endoscopic Instruments and Stents, Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Seoul 03741, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6178-8338
Won Suk ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon 34943, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-7416
The Catholic University of Korea Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital · KRAsan Medical Center · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRInha University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophylactic pancreatic stenting effectively reduces the rate and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in the precut technique; however, studies on the optimal type and duration of the stent are still lacking. This prospective study evaluated the incidence and severity of PEP and the rate of spontaneous stent dislodgement in patients undergoing transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy (TPS) accompanied by prophylactic pancreatic stenting with an unflanged plastic stent (4F × 5 cm) for difficult biliary cannulation. A total of 247 patients with naïve papilla were enrolled in this study, and data were collected prospectively. In the final analysis, 170 and 61 patients were included in the standard cannulation technique and TPS groups, respectively. The incidence of PEP in the standard cannulation technique and TPS groups was 3.5% and 1.6% (

Indexed as

endoscopic sphincterotomyERCPpancreatitisstent

Identifiers

PMID36233560
PMCPMC9573508
OpenAlexW4297541033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.