Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233559›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Gut as an Alternative Entry Route for SARS-CoV-2: Current Evidence and Uncertainties of Productive Enteric Infection in COVID-19.

Laure-Alix Clerbaux, Sally A Mayasich, Amalia Muñoz, Helena Soares, Mauro Petrillo, Maria Cristina Albertini, Nicolas Lanthier, Lucia Grenga, Maria-Joao Amorim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Laure-Alix ClerbauxEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-482X
Sally A MayasichUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison Aquatic Sciences Center at US EPA, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-481X
Amalia MuñozEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Helena SoaresLaboratory of Human Immunobiology and Pathogenesis, iNOVA4Health, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas-Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1099-085 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5881-3843
Mauro PetrilloSeidor Italy Srl, 20129 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-4704
Maria Cristina AlbertiniDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4549-1475
Nicolas LanthierLaboratory of Hepatogastroenterology, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7651-9314
Lucia GrengaDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5560-1717
Maria-Joao AmorimInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-6659
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BECommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FREnvironmental Protection Agency · USEuropean Commission · BEJoint Research Centre · ITUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Urbino · IT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia CEECIND/01049/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia CEECIND/02373/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut has been proposed as a potential alternative entry route for SARS-CoV-2. This was mainly based on the high levels of SARS-CoV-2 receptor expressed in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the observations of GI disorders (such as diarrhea) in some COVID-19 patients and the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces. However, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. It has been proposed that SARS-CoV-2 can productively infect enterocytes, damaging the intestinal barrier and contributing to inflammatory response, which might lead to GI manifestations, including diarrhea. Here, we report a methodological approach to assess the evidence supporting the sequence of events driving SARS-CoV-2 enteric infection up to gut adverse outcomes. Exploring evidence permits to highlight knowledge gaps and current inconsistencies in the literature and to guide further research. Based on the current insights on SARS-CoV-2 intestinal infection and transmission, we then discuss the potential implication on clinical practice, including on long COVID. A better understanding of the GI implication in COVID-19 is still needed to improve disease management and could help identify innovative therapies or preventive actions targeting the GI tract.

Indexed as

COVID-19enteric infectiongastrointestinal disordersgut microbiotaSARS-CoV-2 infection

Identifiers

PMID36233559
PMCPMC9573230
OpenAlexW4297540272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.