Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233549›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Immunohistochemical Markers and TILs Evaluation for Endometrial Carcinoma.

Valentina Elisabetta Bounous, Annamaria Ferrero, Paola Campisi, Luca Fuso, Jeremy Oscar Smith Pezua Sanjinez, Sabrina Manassero, Giovanni De Rosa, Nicoletta Biglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valentina Elisabetta BounousGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6826-4788
Annamaria FerreroGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-3699
Paola CampisiDepartment of Pathology, Umberto I Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Luca FusoGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Jeremy Oscar Smith Pezua SanjinezGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Sabrina ManasseroGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1181-6836
Giovanni De RosaDepartment of Pathology, Umberto I Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Nicoletta BigliaGynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-5309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe molecular classification for endometrial cancer (EC) introduced by The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) and the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) proved the existence of four molecular prognostic subtypes; however, both classifications require costly technology. We suggest a prognostic model for EC based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). STUDY

designOne hundred patients were included. We retrospectively investigated IHC prognostic parameters: mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors, p53 mutation status, progesterone receptors (PgRs), and estrogen receptors (ERs). We further evaluated TILs. These parameters were related to the clinical and morphological features and to the outcome.

resultsWe classified tumors into three groups (IHC analysis): MMR-deficient, p53-mutated, p53 wild-type. MMR-deficient tumors had a good prognosis, p53 wild-type tumors an intermediate one, and p53-mutated tumors had the poorest outcomes. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better among PgR+ tumors (respectively

Indexed as

disease-free survivalendometrial cancerestrogen receptorsimmunohistochemistrymismatch repairoutcome

Identifiers

PMID36233549
PMCPMC9571045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.