Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233540›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Video Laryngoscopy Using King Vision™ aBlade™ and Direct Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Airway Management: A Randomized Controlled Study about Device Learning by Anaesthesia Residents.

Katharina Epp, Sophie Zimmermann, Eva Wittenmeier, Marc Kriege, Frank Dette, Irene Schmidtmann, Nina Pirlich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina EppDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-0630
Sophie ZimmermannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Eva WittenmeierDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-4848
Marc KriegeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-7908
Frank DetteDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Irene SchmidtmannInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8743-6752
Nina PirlichDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-2885
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Airway management in children is challenging due to anatomical and physiological differences. This randomized trial investigates whether anaesthesia residents can intubate the paediatric trachea more quickly and with a higher success rate using the King Vision™ Paediatric aBlade™ video laryngoscope (KVL) compared to conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methods: Eleven anaesthesia residents (mean age: 31 years, mean training status 47 months) were each asked to perform intubations with the KVL and DL in paediatric patients. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes were the time to best view (TTBV), time to placement of the tracheal tube (TTP), time to ventilation (TTV), and participant-reported ease of use on a Likert scale. Results: 105 intubations with the KVL and 106 DL were performed by the residents. The success rate on the first attempt with the KVL was 81%, and the success rate on the first attempt within a given time limit of 30 s was 45%, which was lower than with DL (93% and 77% with time limit, p < 0.01). The median TTBV [IQR] on the first attempt with KVL was 7 [5−10] s, the median TTP was 28 [19−44] s, and the median TTV was 51 [39−66] s. DL-mediated intubation was significantly faster (TTP: 17 [13−23] s; p < 0.0001 and TTV: 34 [28−44] s; p < 0.001). Application of the KVL was rated as difficult or very difficult by 60% of the residents (DL: 5%). Conclusion: In contrast to promising data on the paediatric training manikin, residents took longer to intubate the airway in children with the KVL and were less successful compared to the DL. Therefore, the KVL should not be recommended for learning paediatric intubation by residents.

Indexed as

airway managementendotracheal intubationpaediatricvideo laryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36233540
PMCPMC9573319
OpenAlexW4297504999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.