Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233471›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Mechanisms and Neuroimaging Patterns of Hypereosinophilia-Related Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review through Three Cases.

Maria Cristina Cioclu, Francesco Cavallieri, Manuela Napoli, Claudio Moratti, Rosario Pascarella, Franco Valzania, Marialuisa Zedde

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ischemic Stroke in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome: A Clinicopathologic Study of Two Cases.Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Cristina CiocluNeurology Unit, OCB Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria, 42123 Modena, Italy.
Francesco CavallieriNeurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-1982
Manuela NapoliNeuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-4172
Claudio MorattiNeuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Rosario PascarellaNeuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0512-9298
Franco ValzaniaNeurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Marialuisa ZeddeNeurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7530-818X
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a group of relatively rare disorders in which neurological manifestations, including ischemic stroke, are common. The hypothesized pathophysiological mechanisms are hypercoagulability, cardioembolism (mainly mediated by myocardial involvement) and damage to the endothelium. A variable ischemic pattern has been described, including an association of territorial and border zone ischemic stroke.

methodsThree patients who presented to our department with acute stroke were selected aiming to show these three different mechanisms inferred from the stroke pattern on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to simultaneously illustrate the three main causes of HES. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The first patient is a 55-year-old man with an abrupt onset of aphasia due to an acute ischemic stroke involving the left parietal lobule and the angular gyrus; recent lab test had shown hypereosinophilia. An extensive workup excluded primary and secondary causes of hypereosinophilia so a diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilia was done and he was treated with high doses of steroids. The second patient had severe hypereosinophilia and developed multiple small, scattered ischemic lesions, mainly in border zone zones. The history of severe asthma and recurrent sinusitis supported the diagnosis of EGPA (Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis); considering the severe clinical conditions and the presumptive role of hypereosinophilia in determining her symptoms, steroid treatment was promptly started, with good clinical response. The third patient also presented with multiple metachronous ischemic lesions, both in cortical and border zone distribution and marked eosinophilia; the diagnostic work-up found an ovarian cancer. She was treated with steroids and then underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

conclusionsHES should be considered in stroke etiological evaluation, although it is a rare disorder, and border zones pattern without large artery steno-occlusion on neuroimaging may help to raise the suspicion in the neurovascular diagnostic pathway. A thorough research of the sources of hypereosinophilia should be performed to select the appropriate therapy.

Indexed as

border zone strokebrain MRIembolic patternhypereosinophiliahypereosinophilic syndrome (HES)stroke

Identifiers

PMID36233471
PMCPMC9571035
OpenAlexW4297201589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.