Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233372›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Postpartum Depression after Maternal Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The MUMI-19 Study (Mothers Undergoing Mental Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic).

Lina Boudiaf, Françoise Dupont, Christèle Gras-Le Guen, Anne Sauvaget, Maxime Leroy, Thibault Thubert, Norbert Winer, Vincent Dochez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lina BoudiafService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.
Françoise DupontService de Pédopsychiatrie, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.
Christèle Gras-Le GuenService de Pédiatrie, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.
Anne SauvagetLaboratoire Mouvement, Interactions, Performance (MIP), EA 4334, Nantes Université, CEDEX, 44322 Nantes, France.
Maxime LeroyPlateforme de Méthodologie et Biostatistiques, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.
Thibault ThubertService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.
Norbert WinerService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.
Vincent DochezService de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, CEDEX, 44093 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8077-0288
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has shaken the world by imposing unprecedented health measures, including in the postpartum period. Objectives: We aim to assess the impact of maternal isolation in the immediate postpartum period on the rate of postpartum depression (PPD) in a tertiary center. Study Design: We conducted a prospective cohort study, between 22 April and 29 October 2020, using anonymous questionnaires on 265 participants (129 during lockdown and 135 outside). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used as screening for PPD. We used a univariate logistic regression model to analyze the association between risk factors and PPD. Results: There was no difference between the two groups for PPD assessed by an EPDS score >10.5 on day 30 and/or day 60 (23.1% vs. 29.3%, p = 0.661) but on day 3 it was higher (31% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015) during the lockdown period and partners were more impacted psychologically (48.3% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001). Parity ≥1 was a protective factor for PPD (OR = 0.2, 95% CI [0.1−0.6], p = 0.003). Risk factors of PPD were: history of psychological abuses (OR = 6.4, CI 95% [1.1−37.6], p = 0.04), stressful life event (OR = 4.5, CI 95% [1.6−12.6], p = 0.004), and bad birth experience (OR = 5.1, CI 95% [1.4−17.8], p = 0.012). Conclusion: Maternal isolation in the immediate postpartum period is associated with an increased rate of moderate to severe symptoms of postpartum blues. The well-known long-term consequences of PPD must be balanced against the expected benefits of partner’s restrictive access to maternity ward.

Indexed as

COVID-19depressive disordersEdinburgh Postnatal Depression Scalepostpartum bluespostpartum depression

Identifiers

PMID36233372
PMCPMC9573123
OpenAlexW4296481640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.