ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Selecting for CRISPR-Edited Knock-In Cells.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Viral genome editing methods and applications in the CRISPR era.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Enhancing CRISPR Homology Directed Repair in IAL-PiD2 Insect Cells via Reagent Delivery Optimization and Cell Synchronization.Biochemical engineering journal · 2026Article
- Gene Editing of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Hepatic Cells for Liver Disease Modeling and Therapeutic Development.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Search-and-remove genome editing allows selection of cells by DNA sequence.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Biosensors for Exosomes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- SelectRepair Knockout: Efficient PTC-Free Gene Knockout Through Selectable Homology-Directed DNA Repair.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in of BRCA1/2 mutations restores response to olaparib in pancreatic cancer cell lines.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Efficient tagging of endogenous proteins in human cell lines for structural studies by single-particle cryo-EM.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Enrichment strategies to enhance genome editing.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Review
- Strategies and Methods for Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plant Molecular Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Software System Design to Support Scale in Mammalian Cell Line Engineering.Engineering biologyArticle
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Technologies to Define Endogenous Protein-Protein Interactions and Their Applications to Cancer and Viral Infectious Diseases.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR technology affords a simple and robust way to edit the genomes of cells, providing powerful tools for basic research and medicine. While using Cas9 to target a genomic site is very efficient, making a specific mutation at that site is much less so, as it depends on the endogenous DNA repair machinery. Various strategies have been developed to increase the efficiency of knock-in mutagenesis, but often the desired cells remain a small percentage of the total population. To improve efficiency, strategies to select edited cells have been developed. In some applications, a selectable foreign gene is linked directly to the gene of interest (GOI). Alternatively, co-editing, where the GOI is edited along with a selectable gene, enriches the desired cells since the cells that successfully edited the selectable gene are likely to have also edited the GOI. To minimize perturbations of the host genome, "scarless" selection strategies have been developed, where the modified cells are mutated solely in the GOI. In this review, we will discuss strategies employed to improve specific genome editing in mammalian cells, focusing on ways to select successfully edited cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.