Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233121›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Perspectives for the Use of Fucoidans in Clinical Oncology.

Mikhail V Kiselevskiy, Natalia Yu Anisimova, Nadezhda E Ustyuzhanina, Dmitry Z Vinnitskiy, Alexandra I Tokatly, Vera V Reshetnikova, Irina O Chikileva, Irina Zh Shubina, Kirill I Kirgizov, Nikolay E Nifantiev

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anticancer Mechanism ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail V KiselevskiyN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia.
Natalia Yu AnisimovaN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4370-6578
Nadezhda E UstyuzhaninaN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Av., 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Dmitry Z VinnitskiyN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Av., 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Alexandra I TokatlyN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Av., 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Vera V ReshetnikovaN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia.
Irina O ChikilevaN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-1695
Irina Zh ShubinaN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9374-3158
Kirill I KirgizovN.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 24 Kashirskoe Sh., Moscow 115478, Russia.
Nikolay E NifantievN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Av., 47, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-4050
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUN.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry · RUNational University of Science and Technology · RU

Funding

The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia №075-15-2020-792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fucoidans are natural sulfated polysaccharides that have a wide range of biological functions and are regarded as promising antitumor agents. The activity of various fucoidans and their derivatives has been demonstrated in vitro on tumor cells of different histogenesis and in experiments on mice with grafted tumors. However, these experimental models showed low levels of antitumor activity and clinical trials did not prove that this class of compounds could serve as antitumor drugs. Nevertheless, the anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, immunostimulating, and anticoagulant properties of fucoidans, as well as their ability to stimulate hematopoiesis during cytostatic-based antitumor therapy, suggest that effective fucoidan-based drugs could be designed for the supportive care and symptomatic therapy of cancer patients. The use of fucoidans in cancer patients after chemotherapy and radiation therapy might promote the rapid improvement of hematopoiesis, while their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and anticoagulant effects have the potential to improve the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer.

Indexed as

Cytostatic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsMedical OncologyMicePolysaccharidesQuality of LifeAnticoagulantsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCytostatic AgentsfucoidanPolysaccharidesantitumor activityfucoidanP-selectinsupportive therapy

Identifiers

PMID36233121
PMCPMC9569813
OpenAlexW4303699637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.