Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36233016›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

A Comprehensive Study of Gradient Conditions for Deep Proteome Discovery in a Complex Protein Matrix.

Xing Wei, Pei N Liu, Brian P Mooney, Thao Thi Nguyen, C Michael Greenlief

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xing WeiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Pei N LiuGehrke Proteomics Center, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Brian P MooneyGehrke Proteomics Center, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Thao Thi NguyenGehrke Proteomics Center, Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
C Michael GreenliefDepartment of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6420-7375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bottom-up mass-spectrometry-based proteomics is a well-developed technology based on complex peptide mixtures from proteolytic cleavage of proteins and is widely applied in protein identification, characterization, and quantitation. A tims-ToF mass spectrometer is an excellent platform for bottom-up proteomics studies due to its rapid acquisition with high sensitivity. It remains challenging for bottom-up proteomics approaches to achieve 100% proteome coverage. Liquid chromatography (LC) is commonly used prior to mass spectrometry (MS) analysis to fractionate peptide mixtures, and the LC gradient can affect the peptide fractionation and proteome coverage. We investigated the effects of gradient type and time duration to find optimal gradient conditions. Five gradient types (linear, logarithm-like, exponent-like, stepwise, and step-linear), three different gradient lengths (22 min, 44 min, and 66 min), two sample loading amounts (100 ng and 200 ng), and two loading conditions (the use of trap column and no trap column) were studied. The effect of these chromatography variables on protein groups, peptides, and spectral counts using HeLa cell digests was explored. The results indicate that (1) a step-linear gradient performs best among the five gradient types studied; (2) the optimal gradient duration depends on protein sample loading amount; (3) the use of a trap column helps to enhance protein identification, especially low-abundance proteins; (4) MSFragger and PEAKS Studio have high similarity in protein group identification; (5) MSFragger identified more protein groups among the different gradient conditions compared to PEAKS Studio; and (6) combining results from both database search engines can expand identified protein groups by 9-11%.

Indexed as

ProteomeTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidComplex MixturesHeLa CellsHumansPeptidesComplex MixturesPeptidesProteomebottom–up proteomicsHeLa cellsliquid chromatography gradientmass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID36233016
PMCPMC9569591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.