Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232965›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Laura Vanderwaeren, Rüveyda Dok, Karin Voordeckers, Sandra Nuyts, Kevin J Verstrepen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 6PPD and 6PPD-Q Induce Mitochondrial Dysfunction inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Yeast as a Platform to Dissect Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Function fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Yeast as a Model for Human Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Transcription Regulatory ProteinmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura VanderwaerenLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-3863
Rüveyda DokLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-814X
Karin VoordeckersLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Microbial and Plant Genetics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Sandra NuytsLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5540-4796
Kevin J VerstrepenLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Microbial and Plant Genetics, Department M2S, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-6219

Funding

Emmanuel van der Schueren fellowship for postdoctoral researchers from Kom op Tegen Kanker NAERC Consolidator Grant CoG682009FWO-Vlaanderen 1521019NFWO-Vlaanderen 18B4122NFWO-Vlaanderen NAKU Leuven NAKU Leuven Research Fund C24/17/073VIB NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yeast

Indexed as

Biological PhenomenaSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiologyCell Cycle CheckpointsDNA DamageEukaryotic CellsHumansDNA damage responsemodel systemSaccharomyces cerevisiaeyeast

Identifiers

PMID36232965
PMCPMC9570374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.