ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Bioengineering Approaches to Fight against Orthopedic Biomaterials Related-Infections.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Bone Remodeling Dynamics and Bone Vitality Following Standard Bone Augmentation Procedures: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Influence of Protein Coatings on Bacterial Adhesion to Biomaterials.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
- Laser-Engineered Multilayer Coatings Based on Zinc Oxide and Lovastatin-Functionalized Bioactive Glasses for Corrosion-Resistant and Antimicrobial Stainless Steel Implants.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomaterial-Based Scaffolds as Carriers of Topical Antimicrobials for Bone Infection Prophylaxis.Polish journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Pinosylvin: A Multifunctional Stilbenoid with Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Potential.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Microbiome modulation of implant-related infection by a novel miniaturized pulsed electromagnetic field device.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Preparation of hafnium nitride-coated titanium implants by magnetron sputtering technology and evaluation of their antibacterial properties and biocompatibility.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Biomaterials Based on Physical and Physicochemical Action.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Disability-adjusted life years from bone and joint infections associated with antimicrobial resistance: an insight from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- A biodegradable PVA coating constructed on the surface of the implant for preventing bacterial colonization and biofilm formation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- A Cyclam Salt as an Antifungal Agent: Interference withAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Camel Peptide on the Biofilm ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Biomaterials and Approaches to Its Treatment and Prevention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Bone Grafts in Dental Medicine: An Overview of Autografts, Allografts and Synthetic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most serious complications following the implantation of orthopedic biomaterials is the development of infection. Orthopedic implant-related infections do not only entail clinical problems and patient suffering, but also cause a burden on healthcare care systems. Additionally, the ageing of the world population, in particular in developed countries, has led to an increase in the population above 60 years. This is a significantly vulnerable population segment insofar as biomaterials use is concerned. Implanted materials are highly susceptible to bacterial and fungal colonization and the consequent infection. These microorganisms are often opportunistic, taking advantage of the weakening of the body defenses at the implant surface-tissue interface to attach to tissues or implant surfaces, instigating biofilm formation and subsequent development of infection. The establishment of biofilm leads to tissue destruction, systemic dissemination of the pathogen, and dysfunction of the implant/bone joint, leading to implant failure. Moreover, the contaminated implant can be a reservoir for infection of the surrounding tissue where microorganisms are protected. Therefore, the biofilm increases the pathogenesis of infection since that structure offers protection against host defenses and antimicrobial therapies. Additionally, the rapid emergence of bacterial strains resistant to antibiotics prompted the development of new alternative approaches to prevent and control implant-related infections. Several concepts and approaches have been developed to obtain biomaterials endowed with anti-infective properties. In this review, several anti-infective strategies based on biomaterial engineering are described and discussed in terms of design and fabrication, mechanisms of action, benefits, and drawbacks for preventing and treating orthopaedic biomaterials-related infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.