Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232917›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Studying Synaptic Connectivity and Strength with Optogenetics and Patch-Clamp Electrophysiology.

Louisa E Linders, Laura F Supiot, Wenjie Du, Roberto D'Angelo, Roger A H Adan, Danai Riga, Frank J Meye

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Endocannabinoids inhibit contextual fear memory generalization via hippocampal GABAergic synaptic transmission.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louisa E LindersDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura F SupiotDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6638-5658
Wenjie DuDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roberto D'AngeloDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roger A H AdanDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8994-0661
Danai RigaDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-784X
Frank J MeyeDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-2474
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

China Scholarship Council N/ADutch Research Council 016.Veni.192.188Dutch Research Council VI.Vidi.203.102European Research Council 804089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades the combination of brain slice patch clamp electrophysiology with optogenetic stimulation has proven to be a powerful approach to analyze the architecture of neural circuits and (experience-dependent) synaptic plasticity in such networks. Using this combination of methods, originally termed channelrhodopsin-assisted circuit mapping (CRACM), a multitude of measures of synaptic functioning can be taken. The current review discusses their rationale, current applications in the field, and their associated caveats. Specifically, the review addresses: (1) How to assess the presence of synaptic connections, both in terms of ionotropic versus metabotropic receptor signaling, and in terms of mono- versus polysynaptic connectivity. (2) How to acquire and interpret measures for synaptic strength and function, like AMPAR/NMDAR, AMPAR rectification, paired-pulse ratio (PPR), coefficient of variance and input-specific quantal sizes. We also address how synaptic modulation by G protein-coupled receptors can be studied with pharmacological approaches and advanced technology. (3) Finally, we elaborate on advances on the use of dual color optogenetics in concurrent investigation of multiple synaptic pathways. Overall, with this review we seek to provide practical insights into the methods used to study neural circuits and synapses, by combining optogenetics and patch-clamp electrophysiology.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsSynapsesChannelrhodopsinsElectrophysiologyPatch-Clamp TechniquesSynaptic TransmissionChannelrhodopsinsbrain slicesconnectivityCRACMdual color optogeneticsoptogeneticspatch-clamp electrophysiologyplasticitysynapses

Identifiers

PMID36232917
PMCPMC9570045
OpenAlexW4303699451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.