Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232827›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP)-Informed Personalized Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Detection: An Exploratory Analysis from the PREDATOR Study of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection.

Sara Lonardi, Halla Nimeiri, Chang Xu, Daniel R Zollinger, Russell W Madison, Alexander D Fine, Ole Gjoerup, Cosimo Rasola, Valentina Angerilli, Shruti Sharma and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment for Treatment Monitoring Adds Value to PSA in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Detection ofOncology research · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The ideal reporting ofPathologica · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer: Current and Evolving Practices.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara LonardiVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-8138
Halla NimeiriFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
Chang XuFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-4312
Daniel R ZollingerFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-4228
Russell W MadisonFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
Alexander D FineFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1824-5340
Ole GjoerupFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
Cosimo RasolaVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Valentina AngerilliDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, via Giustiniani, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Shruti SharmaNatera Inc., 13011A McCallen Pass, Austin, TX 78753, USA.
Hsin-Ta WuNatera Inc., 13011A McCallen Pass, Austin, TX 78753, USA.
Charuta C PalsuledesaiNatera Inc., 13011A McCallen Pass, Austin, TX 78753, USA.
Meenakshi MalhotraNatera Inc., 13011A McCallen Pass, Austin, TX 78753, USA.
Alexey AleshinNatera Inc., 13011A McCallen Pass, Austin, TX 78753, USA.
Fotios LoupakisVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Elise RenkonenFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
Priti HegdeFoundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.
Matteo FassanVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6515-5482
Foundation Medicine (United States)Natera (United States) · USUniversity of Padua · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · IT

Funding

Italian Health Ministry/Veneto region research program NET-2016-02363853 and AIRC 5 per mille 2019 (ID. 22759 program)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A majority of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) experience recurrence post curative-intent surgery. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has shown to provide limited survival benefits when applied to all patients. Therefore, a biomarker to assess molecular residual disease (MRD) accurately and guide treatment selection is highly desirable for high-risk patients. This feasibility study evaluated the prognostic value of a tissue comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-informed, personalized circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay (FoundationOne®Tracker) (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) by correlating MRD status with clinical outcomes. ctDNA analysis was performed retrospectively on plasma samples from 69 patients with resected mCRC obtained at the MRD and the follow-up time point. Tissue CGP identified potentially actionable alterations in 54% (37/69) of patients. MRD-positivity was significantly associated with lower disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 4.97, 95% CI: 2.67−9.24, p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 27.05, 95% CI: 3.60−203.46, p < 0.0001). Similarly, ctDNA positive status at the follow-up time point correlated with a marked reduction in DFS (HR: 8.78, 95% CI: 3.59−21.49, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR: 20.06, 95% CI: 2.51−160.25, p < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity and specificity at the follow-up time point were 69% and 100%, respectively. Our results indicate that MRD detection using the tissue CGP-informed ctDNA assay is prognostic of survival outcomes in patients with resected mCRC. The concurrent MRD detection and identification of actionable alterations has the potential to guide perioperative clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionGenomicsHumansNeoplasm, ResidualRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)molecular residual disease (MRD)

Identifiers

PMID36232827
PMCPMC9569771
OpenAlexW4297982435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.