Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232820›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Tumor-Informed Approach Improved ctDNA Detection Rate in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Kazunori Watanabe, Toru Nakamura, Yasutoshi Kimura, Masayo Motoya, Shigeyuki Kojima, Tomotaka Kuraya, Takeshi Murakami, Tsukasa Kaneko, Yoshihito Shinohara, Yosuke Kitayama and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Circulating tumor DNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant cholangiocarcinoma for biomarker-guided therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kazunori WatanabeCancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Toru NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasutoshi KimuraDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-9250
Masayo MotoyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shigeyuki KojimaDivision of Advanced Technology & Development, BML, Inc., Kawagoe 350-1101, Saitama, Japan.
Tomotaka KurayaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi MurakamiDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tsukasa KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yoshihito ShinoharaCancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Yosuke KitayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Hokkaido, Japan.
Keito FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kanako C HatanakaCenter for Development of Advanced Diagnostics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomoko MitsuhashiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Hokkaido, Japan.
Fabio Pittella-SilvaLaboratory of Molecular Pathology of Cancer, Faculty of Healthy Sciences and Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9644-7098
Toshikazu YamaguchiDivision of Advanced Technology & Development, BML, Inc., Kawagoe 350-1101, Saitama, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0808, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yusuke NakamuraCancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Siew-Kee LowCancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPNational Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition · JPUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition SIPAIH18C03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the cancers with very poor prognosis; there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers to improve its clinical outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from liquid biopsy has arisen as a promising biomarker for cancer detection and surveillance. However, it is known that the ctDNA detection rate in resected pancreatic cancer is low compared with other types of cancer. In this study, we collected paired tumor and plasma samples from 145 pancreatic cancer patients. Plasma samples were collected from 71 patients of treatment-naïve status and from 74 patients after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Genomic profiling of tumor DNA and plasma samples was conducted using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Somatic mutations were detected in 85% (123/145) of tumors. ctDNA was detected in 39% (28/71) and 31% (23/74) of treatment-naïve and after-NAT groups, respectively, without referring to the information of tumor profiles. With a tumor-informed approach (TIA), ctDNA detection rate improved to 56% (40/71) and 36% (27/74) in treatment-naïve and after-NAT groups, respectively, with the detection rate significantly improved (

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcancer prognosiscell-free DNAcirculating tumor DNAliquid biopsyneoadjuvant therapynext-generation sequencingpancreatic cancertumor-informed approach

Identifiers

PMID36232820
PMCPMC9570468
OpenAlexW4298146203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.