SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Factors Associated with the Acceptability of Mass Drug Administration for Filariasis: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mathematical modeling for analyzing mass drug administration operational factors for efficient malaria incidence reduction in southern Senegal.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Willingness of adults to accept malaria mass drug administration using the theoretical framework of acceptability: a cross-sectional study in an urban municipality, Ghana.BMC public health · 2026Article
- From genome to drug targets: computational subtractive genomics reveals novel anti-filarial targets in Wuchereria bancrofti and identifies plant-based inhibitors of β-1,4-mannosyltransferase, a high-priority target.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Clinical profile and Mass Drug Administration coverage in patients with lymphatic filariasis: A descriptive study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- Acceptability of mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis in Baglung Municipality of Nepal: A mixed-method study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Inference of essential genes inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Awareness of and participation in mass drug administration programs used for onchocerciasis control in the Atwima Nwabiagya North District, Ghana.Global health research and policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass drug administration (MDA) has been implemented as a tool to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Acceptability among susceptible populations is crucial to achieving MDA effective coverage. This systematic review aims to present and systematically determine the factors associated with the acceptability of MDA. Articles related to factors associated with acceptability were collected electronically from three different databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed). Four pairs of independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the collected data, stored in EndnoteX7, against the inclusion criteria. Afterwards, the included articles have been critically appraised to assess the quality of the studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Of the 68 articles identified, 11 were included in the final review. Knowledge, awareness, attitude and perceptions, communications, delivery and accessibility of MDA, gender, and age are the factors associated with MDA acceptability. Community acceptance remains a challenge in the implementation of MDA. To expand MDA coverage in all endemic countries, there is a strong need to address the factors influencing community acceptance of MDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.