ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Nontyphoidal
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nontyphoidal salmonellosis (NTS) and new-onset hematological malignancy. We conducted a 17-year nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study to examine the association between NTS and the risk of hematological malignancies by using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) of Taiwan. Participants were enrolled from 2000 to 2015 and were monitored until 2017. We traced the years 1998-2000 to ensure that the cases included were newly diagnosed with NTS. The NTS cohort included 13,790 patients with newly diagnosed NTS between 2000 and 2015. Each patient was propensity score matched at a 1:4 ratio with people without NTS. Cumulative incidence, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated after adjusting for age, sex, income, urbanization, and medical comorbidities. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of hematological malignancies for NTS patients relative to those without NTS was 1.42 (95% CI 0.91-2.20). In the age subgroup analysis, NTS had a significantly greater risk of hematological malignancies for patients older than 60 (aHR 3.04, 95% CI 1.46-6.34), with an incidence rate of 11.7 per 10,000 person-years. In patients over 60 years of age, a prominent risk of hematological malignancies was observed at a follow-up of more than 3 years after the index date (aHR 3.93, 95% CI 1.60-9.65). A history of NTS is associated with the risk of subsequent hematological malignancies in Taiwanese subjects older than 60.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.