Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232237›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Advancing Health Research Impact through a Systemic Multi-Sectoral Approach: A Protocol for Introducing Reduced-Sodium Salts and Salty Condiments in Vietnam.

Emalie Rosewarne, Annet C Hoek, Aliyah Palu, Kathy Trieu, Colman Taylor, Do Thi Phuong Ha, Michael Sieburg, Nicole Ide, Kent Buse, Jacqui Webster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emalie RosewarneThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Level 5, 1 King St., Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-3953
Annet C HoekThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Level 5, 1 King St., Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Aliyah PaluThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Level 5, 1 King St., Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Kathy TrieuThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Level 5, 1 King St., Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-2741
Colman TaylorThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Level 5, 1 King St., Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Do Thi Phuong HaNational Institute of Nutrition, Vietnam. 48B Tăng Bạt Hổ Street, Phạm Đình Hổ, Hai Bà Trưng District, Hanoi 11611, Vietnam.
Michael SieburgYCP Solidiance, PTE LTD, Suite 704, Satra Dong Khoi Building, 58 Dong Khoi Street, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.
Nicole IdeResolve to Save Lives, 85 Broad Street, Suite 1626, New York, NY 10004, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4799-6688
Kent BuseThe George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-0110
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Level 5, 1 King St., Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better alignment between health research organisations with the needs (and interests) of key stakeholders in the health policy and research system is critical to improving research impact. The George Institute for Global Health's 'Healthier Societies' program focuses on harnessing the power of governments, markets, and communities to improve population level health equity outcomes and maximise research impact. This protocol outlines a systemic multi-sectoral approach to advance health research impact globally applied to a project to reduce population salt intake in Vietnam by introducing reduced-sodium salts and salty condiments. We defined a systemic multi-sectoral approach to be a strategy that involves engaging with government, market and communities in a deliberate and joined-up way to solve a problem in which they all have a role to play. The project objectives are to: (i) produce reduced-sodium fish sauce products and test consumer acceptability; (ii) investigate the market feasibility of introducing reduced-sodium foods (salt, bot canh and fish sauce) into the Vietnamese market; (iii) estimate the cost-effectiveness of three different government strategies to support the implementation of reduced-sodium products; and (iv) develop an advocacy roadmap to maximise potential research impact. Methods will include standard quality and safety assessments, consumer sensory testing for the locally produced reduced-sodium fish sauces, market feasibility assessment (including collating market data and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders), cost-effectiveness modelling (Markov cohort model), multi-sector stakeholder engagement, and the development of a coordinated advocacy strategy using the Kotter Plus framework. Health research organisations are increasingly seeking ways to achieve greater impact with their research. Through the application of a systemic multi-sectoral approach with governments, markets and communities, this protocol provides an example of how health research projects can achieve such impact.

Indexed as

SaltsSodium Chloride, DietaryAnimalsCondimentsSodiumVietnamSaltsSodiumSodium Chloride, Dietaryglobal healthhealth policyhealthy societiesnutritionresearch impactsalt substitutessodium reductionVietnam

Identifiers

PMID36232237
PMCPMC9565934
OpenAlexW4303981401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.