Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232156›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

SkinSensPred as a Promising in Silico Tool for Integrated Testing Strategy on Skin Sensitization.

Shan-Shan Wang, Chia-Chi Wang, Chun-Wei Tung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shan-Shan WangPh.D. Program in Environmental and Occupational Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6163-120X
Chia-Chi WangDepartment and Graduate Institute of Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1272-1513
Chun-Wei TungInstitute of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County 35053, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3011-8440

Funding

National Science and Technology Council (formerly Ministry of Science and Technology) of Taiwan MOST-110-2221-E-400-004-MY3National Science and Technology Council (formerly Ministry of Science and Technology) of Taiwan MOST-110-2313-B-002-051-Taiwan Agricultural Chemicals and Toxic Substances Research Institute 109AS-24.1.2-PI-P3Taiwan Agricultural Chemicals and Toxic Substances Research Institute 110AS-16.1.1-PI-P2Taiwan Agricultural Chemicals and Toxic Substances Research Institute 111AS-13.1.1-PI-P2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin sensitization is an important regulatory endpoint associated with allergic contact dermatitis. Recently, several adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-based alternative methods were developed to replace animal testing for evaluating skin sensitizers. The AOP-based assays were further integrated as a two-out-of-three method with good predictivity. However, the acquisition of experimental data is resource-intensive. In contrast, an integrated testing strategy (ITS) capable of maximizing the usage of laboratory data from AOP-based and in silico methods was developed as defined approaches (DAs) to both hazard and potency assessment. There are currently two in silico models, namely Derek Nexus and OECD QSAR Toolbox, evaluated in the OECD Testing Guideline No. 497. Since more advanced machine learning algorithms have been proposed for skin sensitization prediction, it is therefore desirable to evaluate their performance under the ITS framework. This study evaluated the performance of a new ITS DA (ITS-SkinSensPred) adopting a transfer learning-based SkinSensPred model. Results showed that the ITS-SkinSensPred has similar or slightly better performance compared to the other ITS models. SkinSensPred-based ITS is expected to be a promising method for assessing skin sensitization.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesDermatitis, Allergic ContactAnimalsComputer SimulationSkinSkin Tests3Radverse outcome pathwaymachine learningskin sensitizationSkinSensPred

Identifiers

PMID36232156
PMCPMC9566590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.