Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232085›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Challenges and Opportunities in Aligning Conservation with Development in China's National Parks: A Narrative Literature Review.

Andrew Rule, Sarah-Eve Dill, Gordy Sun, Aidan Chen, Senan Khawaja, Ingrid Li, Vincent Zhang, Scott Rozelle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew RuleStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Sarah-Eve DillStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9321-6606
Gordy SunStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Aidan ChenStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Senan KhawajaStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ingrid LiStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Vincent ZhangStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Scott RozelleStanford Center on China's Economy and Institutions, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of its effort to balance economic development with environmental objectives, China has established a new national park system, with the first five locations formally established in 2021. However, as the new parks all host or are proximate to human populations, aligning the socioeconomic needs and aspirations of local communities with conservation aims is critical for the long-term success of the parks. In this narrative review, the authors identify the ecological priorities and socioeconomic stakeholders of each of the five national parks; explore the tensions and synergies between these priorities and stakeholders; and synthesize the policy recommendations most frequently cited in the literature. A total of 119 studies were reviewed. Aligning traditional livelihoods with conservation, limiting road construction, promoting education and environmental awareness, and supporting the development of a sustainable tourism industry are identified as important steps to balance conservation with economic development in the new national parks.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesParks, RecreationalChinaEcosystemHumansbiodiversityChinanational parkprotected areasocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID36232085
PMCPMC9566203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.