Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36232065›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evidence-Based Conceptual Collection of Methods for Spatial Epidemiology and Analysis to Enhance Cancer Surveillance and Public Health.

Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla, Vasiliki Eirini Chatzea, Elpiniki Frouzi, Enkeleint A Mechili, Georgia Pistolla, George Nikiforidis, Vassilis Georgoulias, Christos Lionis, Nikos Tzanakis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitra Sifaki-PistollaCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-6266
Vasiliki Eirini ChatzeaCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-5405
Elpiniki FrouziCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Enkeleint A MechiliCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4072-296X
Georgia PistollaCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
George NikiforidisHellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.
Vassilis GeorgouliasCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Christos LionisCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-2839
Nikos TzanakisCancer Registry of Crete, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
University of Crete · GRHellenic Mediterranean University · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Although spatial statistics are often used by cancer epidemiologists, there is not yet an established collection of methods to serve their needs. We aimed to develop an evidence-based cancer-oriented conceptual collection of methods for spatial analysis; (2) Methods: A triangulation of approaches was used; literature review, consensus meetings (expert panel), and testing the selected methods on "training" databases. The literature review was conducted in three databases. This approach guided the development of a collection of methods that was subsequently commented on by the expert panel and tested on "training data" of cancer cases obtained from the Cancer Registry of Crete based on three epidemiological scenarios: (a) low prevalence cancers, (b) high prevalence cancers, (c) cancer and risk factors; (3) Results: The final spatial epidemiology conceptual collection of methods covered: data preparation/testing randomness, data protection, mapping/visualizing, geographic correlation studies, clustering/surveillance, integration of cancer data with socio-economic, clinical and environmental factors. Some of the tests/techniques included in the conceptual collection of methods were: buffer and proximity analysis, exploratory spatial analysis and others. All suggested that statistical models were found to fit well (R2 = 0.72-0.96) in "training data"; Conclusions: The proposed conceptual collection of methods provides public health professionals with a useful methodological framework along with recommendations for assessing diverse research questions of global health.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPublic HealthHumansResearch DesignRisk FactorsSpatial Analysiscancercancer surveillancechronic diseasesenvironmental epidemiologyglobal healthrespiratory diseasesspatial epidemiologyspatial statistics

Identifiers

PMID36232065
PMCPMC9566360
OpenAlexW4303696796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.