Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231967›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

"It Made Me Feel like Things Are Starting to Change in Society:" A Qualitative Study to Foster Positive Patient Experiences during Phone-Based Social Needs Interventions.

Anna L Steeves-Reece, Christina Nicolaidis, Dawn M Richardson, Melissa Frangie, Katherin Gomez-Arboleda, Chrystal Barnes, Minnie Kang, Bruce Goldberg, Stephan R Lindner, Melinda M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patients' Willingness to Accept Social Needs Navigation After In-Person versus Remote Screening.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna L Steeves-ReeceSchool of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9740-5079
Christina NicolaidisSchool of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Dawn M RichardsonSchool of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Melissa FrangieOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Katherin Gomez-ArboledaOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Chrystal BarnesSchool of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Minnie KangOregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Bruce GoldbergSchool of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Stephan R LindnerSchool of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Melinda M DavisSchool of Public Health, Portland State University-Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA.

Funding

Patients' Decisions and Perspectives Regarding Healthcare-Based Social RIsk InterventionsR36HS027707 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI STEEVES-REECE, ANNA · 2020 to 2020
$43k
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 1R36HS027707-01AHRQ HHS R36 HS027707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many healthcare organizations are screening patients for health-related social needs (HRSN) to improve healthcare quality and outcomes. Due to both the COVID-19 pandemic and limited time during clinical visits, much of this screening is now happening by phone. To promote healing and avoid harm, it is vital to understand patient experiences and recommendations regarding these activities. We conducted a pragmatic qualitative study with patients who had participated in a HRSN intervention. We applied maximum variation sampling, completed recruitment and interviews by phone, and carried out an inductive reflexive thematic analysis. From August to November 2021 we interviewed 34 patients, developed 6 themes, and used these themes to create a framework for generating positive patient experiences during phone-based HRSN interventions. First, we found patients were likely to have initial skepticism or reservations about the intervention. Second, we identified 4 positive intervention components regarding patient experience: transparency and respect for patient autonomy; kind demeanor; genuine intention to help; and attentiveness and responsiveness to patients' situations. Finally, we found patients could be left with feelings of appreciation or hope, regardless of whether they connected with HRSN resources. Healthcare organizations can incorporate our framework into trainings for team members carrying out phone-based HRSN interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsEmotionsHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentQualitative Researchhealth-related social needspatient-centered carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID36231967
PMCPMC9566653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.