Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231951›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Sociodemographic Variations in the Availability of Urban Green Spaces in an Older Swedish Population.

Kristoffer Mattisson, Anna Axmon, Gunilla Carlsson, Agneta Malmgren Fänge, Connie Lethin, Emilie Stroh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristoffer MattissonDivision of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3334-9458
Anna AxmonEPI@LUND (Epidemiology, Population Studies, and Infrastructures at Lund University), Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-8337
Gunilla CarlssonDepartment of Health Science, Lund University, 222 40 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-3625
Agneta Malmgren FängeDepartment of Health Science, Lund University, 222 40 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3165-1856
Connie LethinDepartment of Health Science, Lund University, 222 40 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2523-8440
Emilie StrohDivision of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGS) can have a positive impact on health and thereby potentially ease the strain on the health care system. However, the availability and benefits seem to vary between different sociodemographic groups. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between sociodemographic factors and availability to UGS among people aged 65 years or older. Data on sociodemographic variables and residential coordinates were obtained for three cross-sectional cohorts in two cities (Malmö and Kristianstad) and three years (2010, 2015, and 2019). Three measures of urban green spaces; total (UGS), public (PGS) and quiet (QGS), within 300 m were used to determine availability. The results indicated higher availability to both total and publicly available urban green spaces for groups with lower socioeconomic status (SES) is positive from a health perspective. However, availability to high qualitative publicly available urban green spaces, from a noise perspective, was lower, indicating the opposite.

Indexed as

Parks, RecreationalCitiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSwedenageingcross-sectionalgeographical information systemsneighborhoodsocioeconomicurban green space

Identifiers

PMID36231951
PMCPMC9566372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.