ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Slovak Version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBurnout is clinically significant because it has adverse consequences in the form of mental and physical illnesses and economic losses. The goal of the research study was to translate the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) into Slovak and then assess its factor structure, reliability, validity, and psychometric properties.
methodsWe collected two convenience samples: one for the psychometric properties analysis and factor analysis, which consisted of 4789 participants, and the other for the validity analysis, which consisted of 458 participants. Data were collected online. The participants filled out the following questionnaires: Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), Professional Quality of Life Scale (PROQOL), and Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS).
resultsThe CBI had very good reliability in both samples, calculated using Cronbach alpha coefficients (between 0.839 and 0.908). In terms of CBI validity, all the correlation coefficients between the scale and subscales were between moderately high and high and ranged from 0.505 to 0.859. Except for two items, CBI7 and CBI10, all the items fall into the original factors of the scale.
conclusionsThe Slovak version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory is a statistically sound instrument with high coefficients of reliability as well as validity and has an acceptable factor structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.