Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231828›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Hybrid Model Based on Improved Transformer and Graph Convolutional Network for COVID-19 Forecasting.

Yulan Li, Kun Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yulan LiFaculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Kun MaFaculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly around the world since 2020, with a significant fatality rate. Until recently, numerous countries were unable to adequately control the pandemic. As a result, COVID-19 trend prediction has become a hot topic in academic circles. Both traditional models and existing deep learning (DL) models have the problem of low prediction accuracy. In this paper, we propose a hybrid model based on an improved Transformer and graph convolution network (GCN) for COVID-19 forecasting. The salient feature of the model in this paper is that rich temporal sequence information is extracted by the multi-head attention mechanism, and then the correlation of temporal sequence information is further aggregated by GCN. In addition, to solve the problem of the high time complexity of the existing Transformer, we use the cosine function to replace the softmax calculation, so that the calculation of query, key and value can be split, and the time complexity is reduced from the original O(N2) to O(N). We only concentrated on three states in the United States, one of which was the most affected, one of which was the least affected, and one intermediate state, in order to make our predictions more meaningful. We use mean absolute percentage error and mean absolute error as evaluation indexes. The experimental results show that the proposed time series model has a better predictive performance than the current DL models and traditional models. Additionally, our model's convergence outperforms that of the current DL models, offering a more precise benchmark for the control of epidemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Neural Networks, ComputerForecastingHumansTime FactorsCOVID-19deep learninghybrid modelprediction

Identifiers

PMID36231828
PMCPMC9564883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.