Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231794›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

In Search of a Value Proposition for COVID-19 Testing in the Work Environment: A Social Marketing Analysis.

Claudia Parvanta, Alberto J Caban-Martinez, Naciely Cabral, Cynthia K Ball, Kevin G Moore, Adrienne Eastlake, Jeffrey L Levin, Dalia E Nessim, Matthew S Thiese, Paul A Schulte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia ParvantaCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Alberto J Caban-MartinezDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5960-1308
Naciely CabralCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9165-9972
Cynthia K BallDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Kevin G MooreDepartment of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Ferguson College of Agriculture and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Adrienne EastlakeNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
Jeffrey L LevinDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Dalia E NessimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX 75708, USA.
Matthew S ThieseDepartment of Family & Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Paul A SchulteAdvance Technologies and Laboratories International, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-0446
The University of Texas at Tyler · USUniversity of South Florida · USAdvanced Technologies and Laboratories International (United States) · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USOklahoma State University · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined employer experience with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) asymptomatic testing through a social marketing lens. Social marketing uses commercial marketing principles to achieve socially beneficial ends including improved health and safety behavior.

methodTwenty employers across 11 occupational sectors were interviewed about implementation of COVID-19 testing from January through April 2021. Recorded transcripts were coded and analyzed using marketing's "Four P's": "product," "price," "place," "promotion."

resultsCOVID-19 tests (product) were uncomfortable, were easily confused, and didn't solve problems articulated by employers. Testing was not widely available or didn't line up with shifts or locations (place). The perceived price, which included direct and associated costs (e.g., laboratory fees, productivity loss, logistical challenges) was high. Most crucially, the time to receive (PCR) results negated the major benefit of less time spent in quarantine and challenged employer trust. A potential audience segmentation strategy based on perceptions of exposure risk also emerged.

conclusionsThis social marketing analysis suggests ways to improve the value proposition for asymptomatic testing through changes in product, price, and placement features in line with employers' expressed needs. Study findings can also inform creation of employee communication materials that balance perceived rewards of testing against perceived risks of exposure.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MarketingCOVID-19 TestingHealth BehaviorHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19COVID-19 testingNational Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) sectorqualitative data analysisSARS-CoV-2social marketingworksite health promotion

Identifiers

PMID36231794
PMCPMC9566354
OpenAlexW4303685800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.