Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231790›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Contamination Evaluation and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Karst Soil Using UNMIX Model and Pb-Cd Isotopes.

Enjiang Yu, Hongyan Liu, Faustino Dinis, Qiuye Zhang, Peng Jing, Fang Liu, Xianhang Ju

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pollution Risk Prediction for Cadmium in Soil from an Abandoned Mine Based on Random Forest Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enjiang YuCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Hongyan LiuCollege of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5738-4250
Faustino DinisCollege of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Qiuye ZhangCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6709-1862
Peng JingCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Fang LiuCollege of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xianhang JuCollege of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Guizhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karst terrain is the typical area covered with a high background of heavy metals under geochemical anomaly. This research explored the accumulation of geochemical elements and soil sources in karst terrain from rock and soil exposed in carbonate areas. The comprehensive ecological risk and enrichment of heavy metals from parent rock weathered to soil was investigated in 11 formations in the carbonate and clastic areas of the Weining and Hezhang counties in northwest Guizhou. The single factor pollution index, geoaccumulation index, and the potential risk coefficient were used to assess the environmental risk. The results revealed that the heavy metals in an overall geologically high background level of soil in northwest Guizhou is at a slight risk level. However, except for Cd, the heavy metals did not exceed the standard pollution reference. Moreover, the UNMIX model and Cd and Pb isotopes were used to analyze the source of heavy metals, comprising of cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn), and the geochemical elements of silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca). The study showed that most elements in the soil carbonate area exceed the national standard, and the heavy metals in the soil showed a strong enrichment, while the major elements Si and Mg display strong loss. Heavy metal concentrations in soil in the carbonate area were higher than in the clastic area. Geological sources and atmospheric deposition were the main contributors to heavy metal concentrations in both carbonate and clastic areas, and their concentrations differ according to soils developing in different formations.

Indexed as

ArsenicMetals, HeavySoil PollutantsAluminumCadmiumCalciumCarbonatesChinaChromiumCopperEnvironmental MonitoringIronIsotopesLeadMagnesiumNickelAluminumArsenicCadmiumCalciumCarbonatesChromiumCopperIronIsotopesLeadMagnesiumMetals, HeavyNickelSiliconSoilSoil PollutantsZincenrichmentheavy metalsisotopeskarst areassource apportionment

Identifiers

PMID36231790
PMCPMC9566772
OpenAlexW4303685833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.