Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231767›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Ischemic Trigger Point Compression in the Gluteus Medius in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Short-Term Clinical Trial.

Sara Delgado Álvarez, Jorge Velázquez Saornil, Zacarías Sánchez Milá, Gonzalo Jaén Crespo, Angélica Campón Chekroun, José Manuel Barragán Casas, Raúl Frutos Llanes, David Rodríguez Sanz

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara Delgado ÁlvarezFisioSalud Ávila, 05002 Ávila, Spain.
Jorge Velázquez SaornilDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidad Católica de Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-2019
Zacarías Sánchez MiláDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidad Católica de Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-2084
Gonzalo Jaén CrespoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
Angélica Campón ChekrounCampus San Jerónimo Guadalupe, Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
José Manuel Barragán CasasDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidad Católica de Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain.
Raúl Frutos LlanesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidad Católica de Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain.
David Rodríguez SanzFacultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-6590
Catholic University of Ávila · ESUniversidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the gluteus medius is one of the possible causes of non-specific low back pain. Dry needling (DN) and ischemic compression (IC) techniques may be useful for the treatment of these MTrPs.

methodsFor this study, 80 participants were randomly divided into two groups: the dry needling group, who received a single session of DN to the gluteus medius muscle plus hyperalgesia (

resultsStatistically significant differences were shown between the two groups immediately after the intervention, showing a decrease in PPT (

conclusionsIC could be more advisable than DN with respect to UDP and pain intensity in the most hyperalgesic latent MTrPs of the gluteus medius muscle in subjects with non-specific low back pain, immediately after treatment. DN may be more effective than IC in terms of PPT, pain intensity, and quality of life in treating latent plus hyperalgesic gluteus medius muscle MTrPs in subjects with non-specific low back pain after 48 h and after one week of treatment.

Indexed as

Dry NeedlingLow Back PainHumansHyperalgesiaQuality of LifeTrigger PointsUridine DiphosphateUridine Diphosphatelow back painmanual therapiesmyofascial pain syndromephysiotherapy techniquestrigger points

Identifiers

PMID36231767
PMCPMC9564974
OpenAlexW4303685895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.