Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Price and Prejudice? The Value of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy.

Gyeyoung Choi, Gyeongseon Shin, SeungJin Bae

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gyeyoung ChoiCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9679-8779
Gyeongseon ShinCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8048-0670
SeungJin BaeCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-8884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown a high response rate in lymphoma patients, its cost-effectiveness is controversial due to the high price and uncertainty of the clinical evidence. In addition to the high acquisition cost of CAR T-cell therapy, procedure and facility cost increase the financial burden considering the frequency of adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome. In clinical research, relatively short follow-up periods were used compared to traditional cancer agents. In addition, head-to-head comparative effectiveness data are unavailable, which is an important factor when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a new treatment. Additional evidence that will compensate for the uncertainty of existing clinical data is needed for full evaluation of long-term efficacy, safety, and comparative effectiveness.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansPrejudiceReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T-cellchimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapyeconomic evaluationvalue

Identifiers

PMID36231661
PMCPMC9566791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.