Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231617›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Comparative Analysis of Composite Mortality Prediction Scores in Intensive Care Burn Patients.

Doha Obed, Mustafa Salim, Nadjib Dastagir, Samuel Knoedler, Khaled Dastagir, Adriana C Panayi, Peter M Vogt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07526610 (Predictive Mortality Scales in the Burn Patient Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07526610 completednot on this map

Predictive Mortality Scales in the Burn Patient Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosRan2019 to 2026Enrolled465ConditionsBurn Any Degree Involving 20-29 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 30-39 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 40-49 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 50-59 Percent of Body Surface
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of Burn Severity and Mortality Evaluation Tools in Older Patients.Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adipokines-A Cohort Prospective Study in Children with Severe Burns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Doha ObedDepartment of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Mustafa SalimDepartment of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Nadjib DastagirDepartment of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Samuel KnoedlerDepartment for Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5798-8003
Khaled DastagirDepartment of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Adriana C PanayiDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Peter M VogtDepartment of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple outcome scoring models have been used in predicting mortality in burn patients. In this study, we compared the accuracy of five established models in predicting outcomes in burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit and assessed risk factors associated with mortality. Intensive care burn patients admitted between March 2007 and December 2020 with total body surface area (TBSA) affected ≥ 10% were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine variables associated with mortality. The ABSI, Ryan, BOBI, revised Baux and BUMP scores were analyzed by receiver operating characteristics. A total of 617 patients were included. Morality was 14.4%, with non-survivors being significantly older, male, and having experienced domestic burns. Multivariate analysis identified age, TBSA, full-thickness burns and renal insufficiency as independent mortality predictors. The BUMP score presented the highest mortality prognostication rate, followed by ABSI, revised Baux, BOBI and Ryan scores. BUMP, ABSI and revised Baux scores displayed AUC values exceeding 90%, indicating excellent prognostic capabilities. The BUMP score showed the highest accuracy of predicting mortality in intensive care burn patients and outperformed the most commonly used ABSI score in our cohort. The older models displayed adequate predictive performance and accuracy compared with the newest model.

Indexed as

BurnsBurn UnitsAge FactorsCritical CareHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesABSI scoreBAUXBOBIBUMP scoreburn intensive careburn mortalityburn survival

Identifiers

PMID36231617
PMCPMC9564531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.