Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231552›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Airborne Microplastic in the Atmospheric Deposition and How to Identify and Quantify the Threat: Semi-Quantitative Approach Based on Kraków Case Study.

Kinga Jarosz, Rafał Janus, Mariusz Wądrzyk, Wanda Wilczyńska-Michalik, Piotr Natkański, Marek Michalik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Plastics and Micro/Nano-Plastics (MNPs) in the Environment: Occurrence, Impact, and Toxicity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kinga JaroszInstitute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3a, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1241-7562
Rafał JanusFaculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9143-8670
Mariusz WądrzykFaculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-2276
Wanda Wilczyńska-MichalikInstitute of Geography, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Podchorążych 2, 33-332 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7620-8532
Piotr NatkańskiFaculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, ul. Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2937-7958
Marek MichalikInstitute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3a, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5033-2589
Jagiellonian University · PLAGH University of Krakow · PLUniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airborne microplastic is an emerging and widespread pollutant yet is still under-characterised and insufficiently understood. Detailed description of microplastic air pollution is crucial as it has been identified in human lungs and remote locations, highlighting the atmosphere as a medium of MP dispersion and transportation. The lack of standardization of methods for measuring and further monitoring of microplastic pollution is an obstacle towards assessment of health risks. Since the first recognition of MP presence in the atmosphere of Krakow in 2019, this research was conducted to further characterise and develop the methods for qualitative and quantitative analysis of airborne microplastic (attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR); pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS); scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy SEM-EDS) and pre-treatment of samples. The data were gathered in seven cycles from June 2019 to February 2020. The methods used in the study allowed the identification and analysis of the changing ratio of the different types of synthetic polymers identified in the atmospheric fallout (low-density polyethylene, nylon-66, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene and polyurethane). Observations of interactions between microplastic particles and the environment were conducted with analyses of surface changes due to degradation. Different phases attached to the microplastics surfaces, with some of the inorganic contaminants transported on these surfaces determined also to be of anthropogenic origin. The methodology proposed in this study allows further characterisation of microplastic from multiple locations to provide highly comparable data, leading to identification of the sources of this phenomenon, as well as seasonal changes.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansNylonsPlasticsPolyethylenePolyethylene TerephthalatesPolypropylenesPolyurethanesMicroplasticsNylonsPlasticsPolyethylenePolyethylene TerephthalatesPolypropylenesPolyurethanesWater Pollutants, Chemicalairborne microplasticsmicroplastic pollution monitoringurban pollution

Identifiers

PMID36231552
PMCPMC9564561
OpenAlexW4297540245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.