Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231500›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Validation and Improvement of a Convolutional Neural Network to Predict the Involved Pathology in a Head and Neck Surgery Cohort.

Dorian Culié, Renaud Schiappa, Sara Contu, Boris Scheller, Agathe Villarme, Olivier Dassonville, Gilles Poissonnet, Alexandre Bozec, Emmanuel Chamorey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dorian CuliéHead and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.
Renaud SchiappaEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-9507
Sara ContuEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.
Boris SchellerHead and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.
Agathe VillarmeHead and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.
Olivier DassonvilleHead and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.
Gilles PoissonnetHead and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9022-4352
Alexandre BozecHead and Neck Surgery Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-3052
Emmanuel ChamoreyEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data Department, Antoine Laccassagne Center, 06100 Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6841-4571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of patients for the constitution of a cohort is a major issue for clinical research (prospective studies and retrospective studies in real life). Our objective was to validate in real life conditions the use of a Deep Learning process based on a neural network, for the classification of patients according to the pathology involved in a head and neck surgery department. 24,434 Electronic Health Records (EHR) from the first visit between 2000 and 2020 were extracted. More than 6000 EHR were manually classified in ten groups of interest according to the reason for consultation with a clinical relevance. A convolutional neural network (TensorFlow, previously reported by Hsu et al.) was then used to predict the group of patients based on their pathology, using two levels of classification based on clinically relevant criteria. On the first and second level of classification, macro-average performances were: 0.95, 0.83, 0.85, 0.97, 0.84 and 0.93, 0.76, 0.83, 0.96, 0.79 for accuracy, recall, precision, specificity and F1-score versus accuracy, recall and precision of 0.580, 580 and 0.582 for Hsu et al., respectively. We validated this model to predict the pathology involved and to constitute clinically relevant cohorts in a tertiary hospital. This model did not require a preprocessing stage, was used in French and showed equivalent or better performances than other already published techniques.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNeural Networks, ComputerCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiescohort constitutionneural networkpatient classification

Identifiers

PMID36231500
PMCPMC9564535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.